Search for: "RALPH J. KELLY" Results 21 - 27 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2022, 6:23 am by Ryan Goodman
(R-TX) Kevin Brady (R-TX) Tony Gonzales (R-TX) Joe Wilson (R-SC) Barry Moore (R-AL) Robert Aderholt (R-AL) Dan Newhouse (R-WA) Mike Carey (R-OH) Blake Moore (R-UT) Doug Lamborn (R-CO) James Comer (R-KY) Gary Palmer (R-AL) August Pfluger (R-TX) Chris Stewart (R-UT) Ralph Norman (R-SC) Brad Wenstrup (R-OH) Ashley Hinson (R-IA) Beth Van Duyne (R-TX) Brian Babin (R-TX) Jim Banks (R-IN) Cathay McMorris Rodgers (R-WA) Tracey Mann (R-KS) House Resolution 1038 (introduced April 6, 2022)… [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Dorchester, MA; Kelly Flannery, President) Abtech Corp. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
As Virus Spread, Reports of Trump Administration’s Private Briefings Fueled Sell-Off New York Times – Kate Kelly and Mark Mazzetti | Published: 10/14/2020 On the day President Trump declared the coronavirus was “very much under control,” senior members of the president’s economic team, privately addressing board members of the Hoover Institution, were less confident. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ralph Norman, one of three Republican members of Congress who filed a lawsuit against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi over the chamber’s mask mandate, tested positive for the coronavirus. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:49 am by JD Hull
Bradlee with Washington Post owner Katherine Graham in 1971. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]