Search for: "Robert Printz"
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2016, 12:23 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
Even the Rehnquist and Roberts Court's federalism doctrines have altered the New Deal settlement only at the margins. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 7:51 pm
Of course, it’s not just Printz that got in the way. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Yet the Court found one in Printz v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Misunderstanding Preemption In the early Nineteenth Century, New York granted a monopoly to steamboat inventors Robert Fulton and Robert Livingston to operate along the state’s waterways. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Dorf, a Justia columnist, is the Robert S. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
(Will Baude) Yesterday I posted the amicus brief that I and a group of constitutional law scholars filed in the Court’s recess appointments case, Noel Canning. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:54 pm
Lopez, Morrison, and Printz were ready to be picked up and turned loose. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
United States and Printz. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm
But, the opinion relies on prior federalism opinions such as New York and Printz, which are heavy on dual sovereignty and light on cooperative federalism. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:41 am
United States, Printz v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:18 pm
United States or Printz v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:01 am
They were 5-4 decisions, as was Printz. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:32 am
” Briefly: The Student Printz reports that Justice Scalia will speak at the University of Southern Mississippi. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:44 am
United States and Printz. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
Or did these cases (along with cases such as New York, Printz and Alden) establish a post-New Deal baseline (“this far and no farther”) beyond which Congress may not go without meeting a serious burden of justification? [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
Douglas gives the Roberts Court a chance to consider directly some formerly peripheral thoughts regarding limiting access to federal courts when the law at issue is an exercise of conditional spending power. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:47 pm
United States, Printz v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:01 pm
Most prominently, in Printz v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 8:42 am
Moreover, in his dissenting opinion in Comstock, Justice Thomas quotes from Justice Scalia’s opinion in Printz about the Necessary and Proper Clause being the last best hope of those who would defend the ultra vires powers of Congress, suggesting that Justice Scalia still hold that view. [read post]
