Search for: "Robert S Kant"
Results 21 - 40
of 101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2019, 10:05 am
She identifies this idea with the Golden Rule and with Immanuel Kant's categorical imperative, and notes that "it is a concept that is affirmed by religious and philosophical traditions all over the world," (p. x) giving examples from the New Testament, the Talmud, Edmund Burke, writers in Ancient Egypt, and Confucius. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm
That’s true, in th [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:44 am
See, e.g., the shouting match between Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Breyer about Brown in Parents Involved (where I believe Breyer was clearly correct, for what that’s worth). [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:30 am
” Legal scholars were unimpressed, to say the least, by Chief Justice Roberts’s flippant dismissal of their work. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
It gave McIntyre a life-long interest in the subject in general and a particular fondness for Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.[7] Given this deep affinity between philosophy and law, one might expect to see explicit references to the major philosophers in the decisions written by judges.[8] This study discusses the extent to which this is true. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 1:52 pm
Dignity at once constrains and empowers.In an incisive and discriminating discussion of Michael Rosen’s treatment of Kant and the idea of dignity in the former’s book, Dignity: Its History and Meaning (2012), Thomas E. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
Roberts let rip that nobody needs an article about “the influence of Immanuel Kant on evidentiary approaches in 18th Century Bulgaria, or something. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:30 am
” Robert Ferrell concluded that the pact showed “that American popular understanding of the great problems and policies of post-1918 international affairs was appallingly naïve. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
Of course, all the world’s major religions, with their emphasis on love, compassion, patience, tolerance and forgiveness, can and do promote inner values. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:28 pm
By Trump’s logic, taking down German monuments to Hitler and Goebbels might lead to the removal of monuments to Immanuel Kant, who expressed racist sentiments in some of his writings. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 3:30 am
But the juxtaposition of Jim Pfander’s erudite and magisterial new monograph, Constitutional Torts and the War on Terror, and the Supreme Court’s June 19 decision in Ziglar v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
The tenet of individualism runs through the political philosophy of Kant, Hobbes, Locke, all the way through to Nozick and beyond. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 8:57 am
Kant’s Ethical Thought. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm
Under pressure, Clement’s firm asked him to drop the case. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 4:59 am
...with the first of a series of lectures on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 12:03 am
Geoff Gordon, Natural Law in International Legal Theory: Linear and Dialectical Presentations Robert Knox, Marxist Approaches to International Law Oliver Jütersonke, Realist Approaches to International Law Oliver Kessler, Constructivism and the Politics of International Law Peter Goodrich, The International Signs Law Samantha Besson, Moral Philosophy and International Law Jörg Kammerhofer, International Legal Positivism Hengameh Saberi, Yale's Policy Science and… [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 11:53 am
Robert Sparrow’s essay “War without Virtue” (which can be found in Killing by Remote Control: The Ethics of an Unmanned Military, edited by Bradley Jay Strawser) updates Glover’s concerns to the present day, questioning what effects the distant, mediated violence of drone warfare will have on the military virtue of mercy. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 11:24 pm
True, there was a critical edge in Roberts’s delivery. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 7:27 am
Back in 2011, Roberts joked that he found law reviews irrelevant, and found no need to know why there was any influence on 18th century Bulgaria by philosopher Immanuel Kant. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 7:25 am
A while ago, I wrote about Adam Liptak's criticism of law reviews, and argued that Liptak's criticism lacked novelty. [read post]
