Search for: "Rose v. Holder"
Results 21 - 40
of 188
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am
Trump v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:00 pm
The central bank’s economic activity index rose by 0.69 per cent from May. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am
“Public museums are committed to spreading knowledge and to making their collections accessible,”[4] and as stay-at-home orders tested this commitment, museums around the world rose to the challenge. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 1:33 am
Take IP Bridge v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994). [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am
Specified office holders are the Lord Advocate, Advocate General or the Attorney General. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
” Now leading precedent in Canadian Aboriginal law, the decision produced in Delgamuukw v British Columbia has been cited countless times in both the courts and the legal academy. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
As IPKat explains, Kelis is not the rights holder of the song: her problem is with her producers, not Beyoncé. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 4:50 am
The case, Rose et al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Registration v. acquisition is also a big deal. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 8:36 pm
The regime proposes imposing obligations on CASSPrs similar to those obligations currently applying to AFSL holders. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Panel 17 – Copyright Substantial Similarity Crossprogrammed with my panel; I came here first because I had more experience with the first paper in the other panel. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 2:14 pm
Katfriend Henry Yang summarised the reasoning of the Court of Appeal thereto in the recent case of Autostore v Ocado.GuestKat Rose Hughes considered the tricky balance to be struck in determining when pre-clinical data plausibly supports a therapeutic effect, as was raised in a recent Board of Appeal decision (T 966/18). [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm
The actual or potential use of registered marks in another form is irrelevant when comparing the signs [para. 25] (emphasis added).This is consistent with paragraph 34 of Mitrakos v EUIPO – Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS), which refers to paragraph 38 of Pico Food v OHIM — Sobieraj (MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE). [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
From Finjan, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 9:43 pm
In Campbell v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 9:43 pm
In Campbell v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:54 am
GuestKat Rose Hughes explained the implications of the UK's incorporation of the SPC Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 469/2009) into domestic law for UK SPC holders, with elements of both continuity and potentially critical change. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a trailblazer who fought for gender equality as a lawyer and became a beloved hero of the progressive movement as a justice, died on Friday of complications from pancreatic cancer. [read post]
