Search for: "S/V Jolly Good"
Results 21 - 40
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2015, 2:59 pm
Selden and the decision in question is Columbia Motor Car Co. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 11:20 pm
I don’t begrudge her the occasional all expenses paid jollys. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:29 pm
Last week, in Bell v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 4:30 am
Maybe it is like Conrad’s story “Youth,” where the adventures of one’s salad days grab a big, jolly piece of the brain-pan and refuse to let go. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:39 am
There’s nothing like jollying up a Macmillan Cancer Support coffee morning by making your neighbours feel like the pakoras were a little unwelcome. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 10:43 am
The IPKat has since been informed by genial fellow blogger and jolly nice fellow Gilberto Macias that, as this Kat had predicted, the Board of Appeal decision in WEBSHIPPING has been appealed, as Case T-142/15 - DHL Express (France) v OHIM - Chronopost (WEBSHIPPING). [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 1:06 am
This rule provided two grounds for setting aside a default judgment: (i) did the defendant's proposed defence have a real prospect of success, or (ii) was there some other good reason to set aside the judgment in order to allow a defendant to defend the case? [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 8:06 am
One is good for you, the other probably is not so good. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:10 am
In the chair is the perspicacious David Rosenberg (Vice President of IP Policy, at GlaxoSmithKline) and, if he supplies some spice, the main courses are furnished by Sir Alasdair Breckenridge (former Chairman of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency and also of the Committee on Safety of Medicines) and Peter Feldschreiber (a barrister-physician and a Jolly Good Fellow of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Medicine). [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 1:00 pm
It's all good. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 4:30 am
So far so good. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 2:09 am
The court would grant Ericsson's application, confining the order to TCT's case in defence to the infringement counterclaim.Says the IPKat, while this may all seem very complex and convoluted, especially such a long way ahead of the full trial, this is a jolly good way of refining the issues and making sure they stay refined, in order to smooth the path to a trial of the issues that really matter -- validity and infringement -- in the most direct and… [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:34 am
Let's have the Press Office of the Episcopal Diocese tell us what happened on Day 7 of the trial, with ECUSA and ECSC putting on their portion of the case (I have added some explanatory notes, taken from my daily postings on the trial over at StandFirm):DAY SEVEN: DIOCESE OF SC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:38 am
Which is, in essence, splitting the difference even if it's wholly stupid.The case is Paroline v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
It happened again last week, in Wallace v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
And one cannot help wonder, thinking about L'Oréal v Bellure, how many average consumers' economic behaviour would have been altered by the knowledge that they were faced with a smell-alike version of the real upmarket scent. [read post]
Discovery Rule, Cross-Jurisdictional Tolling, and "Equitable" Tolling Cannot Save Aredia-Zometa Case
16 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
In Jolly v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:19 pm
A challenge to the latter was not part of Nestlé's appeal on this occasion. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 11:12 pm
Murder v. subsidence? [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:33 am
What can be said, however, is this: you have to have a jolly good reason for wanting survey evidence bedore you'll get it -- particularly where their probative value is likely to be low in the great order of things. [read post]
