Search for: "Standard Benefit Administrators" Results 21 - 40 of 12,675
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 10:52 am by Peter
For more nearly a century the U.S. has enjoyed the benefit of being considered [...] [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 6:28 am by admin
Certain types of employees, despite working overtime for their company, are deemed to be “exempt” and are not eligible for overtime benefits from their employer under the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
26 May 2021, 4:43 pm by John Lande
  Unfortunately, with some frequency, there have … Continue reading Proposal for Standard Explanation in Mediation → [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm by WIMS
EPA build on the Administration's standards for cars and light trucks for Model Years 2011-2016. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:34 am
A child who suffers from Autism may qualify for Social Security disability benefits, but the symptoms must meet a certain standard in order to be eligible for benefits. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 9:28 am
Two judges on a split panel of the First Circuit Court of Appeals recently suggested that the full court, sitting en banc, ought to revisit the standard of review applicable to ERISA cases in which the plan administrator determines benefits eligibility and also funds benefit payments. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 12:00 am by Peña & Bromberg, PLC
To receive SSD or SSI benefits, you will need to prove that you are disabled per the Social Security Administration’s definition. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 10:40 am by Rich McHugh
By Rich McHugh The Obama administration recently released its budget proposals for Fiscal Year 2015 and as in past years those proposals contained a number of provisions that would affect employee benefit plans. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm
While the Food and Drug Administration refuses to recognize the benefits of medicinal marijuana, leading experts classify cannabis as a botanical medicine. [read post]
29 May 2020, 8:50 am by PaperStreet Web Design
Social Security benefits are not limited to retirement benefits, dependent benefits, survivor benefits, and standard disability benefits. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 10:07 am by Vondrae
  We have previously blogged about how this discretionary standard of review is a nightmare in court for individuals seeking benefits. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 6:38 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
As the official in charge of the Employee Benefits Security Administration in the Obama administration, she helped draft the now vacated DOL Fiduciary Rule. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 10:00 am by Ortiz Law Firm
This standard does not require the court to merely rubber-stamp the administrator’s decision. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 3:35 am by Dennis Crouch
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), International Trade Administration (ITA), and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have extended the deadline for public comments on their request for information on standards and intellectual property. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:36 am
Rather, most of the time, the same administrative record that would justify upholding a denial under the arbitrary and capricious standard on the theory that the administrator’s decision is reasonable given the evidence in the record, also contains enough evidence to prove the administrator correct under a de novo standard of review, where the court makes its own independent determination of the claimant’s entitlement to… [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 8:53 am by Bryan L. Capps
  If you are denied health insurance or other benefits, your ERISA plan administrator must give you the reason for denial in writing and in a manner you can understand. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm
Retirement Plans Subject to ERISA Vesting Standards Must File Form 8955-SSA by January 17, 2012 Section 6057(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") requires plan administrators of retirement plans subject to the vesting standards under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA") to report information regarding separated participants with deferred vested benefits that have not commenced. [read post]