Search for: "State of North Carolina v. Tennessee Valley Authority"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2008, 7:42 am
Tennessee Valley Auth., No. 06-2131 In common-law nuisance action contending coal plants emit various pollutants which travel through the atmosphere into North Carolina, adversely impacting human health and environmental quality, denial of defendant authority's motion to dismiss is affirmed over claims that the suit is barred by: 1) the discretionary function doctrine; 2) the Supremacy Clause; and 3) the holding of Ferris v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:00 am
For example, in Erwin v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
For example, in Ashwander v Tennessee Valley Authority, the Supreme Court explained that Article 3 prevents the court from considering “the constitutionality of legislation in a friendly, non-adversary proceeding,” as with abstract review. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
A state court said no. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, January 27, 2010 EPA has entered into a Consent Agreement with Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc. and Hydro Aluminum Precision Tubing North America, LLC, wholly owned subsidiaries of Norsk Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm
This week, in Torres v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Holland 1916, Inc., of 1340 Burlington Street, North Kansas City, Mo., failed to file the disclosure reports with state and federal authorities for the calendar years 2006, 2007 and 2008, according to a consent agreement and final order filed in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm
., 2003[12]2003601Green onions Pennsylvania,Tennessee, Georgia, North CarolinaMexico, two farmsContaminated during or before packing at farmCDC, 2003[13]; Wheeler et al., 2005[14]2009562Tomatoes (semidried)AustraliaUnknown; imported and domestic product involvedProduct suspected to be imported due to concurrent outbreaks elsewhere at the time, source of contamination unknownDonnan et al., 2012[15]200913Tomatoes(semidried)NetherlandsUnknown; imported product suspectedIdentical… [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Click Here North Idaho Developers Fined Nearly $45K for Storm Water Violations. [read post]
