Search for: "Sundance Services, Inc." Results 21 - 25 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Sundance, Inc., the Court held that a party waives its right to compel arbitration by acting in a manner inconsistent with its arbitration rights, even if the party opposing arbitration has suffered no prejudice. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral rights famous… [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
Statewide Healthcare Service, Inc., 585 So.2d 778 (Miss. 1991); Hewett v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:53 pm by Eric
In many cases, this includes court orders that purport to bind third party service providers (who also aren't in court to defend their interests), even though Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 65 doesn't allow judges to tell non-litigants what to do. [read post]