Search for: "T. QUILLEN"
Results 21 - 40
of 93
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
Mark Lemley cited Cecil Quillen early on in the Northwestern Law Review article on rational ignorance. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:44 pm
There aren’t enough details in the article to say for sure how I would defend him, if I were his attorney, but I did notice that he seems to have left the Boston Market rather than go inside and have the meeting. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
[citing to Parchomovsky (but not mentioning co-author Polk Wagner), 154 U Penn L Rev 1 and then citing to Cecil Quillen (but not mentioning co-author Webster), specifically the FIRST Quillen/Webster paper, 11 Fed. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 9:09 am
To the man who asked him how he liked it, he said: ‘If it wasn’t for the honor of the thing, I’d rather walk. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 6:39 am
Sort of like "waving the red flag" in the post-Civil War era, but that dog won't hunt anymore. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:00 am
This is a nonsensical situation, and one of the chief culprits is patents that issue that shouldn't issue. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 5:18 pm
Minor’s clients weren’t malicious, they were just dumb. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:37 am
One can't "rebound" by collecting a renewal fee on a patent application that was rejected.We can thank the USPTO's draconian response to Quillen and Webster's fanciful "97%" allowance rate for this time bomb. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 5:17 pm
I fell out of my chair when I heard the size of his patent filing budget compared to Intel's research budget, and he said that he wasn't even counting the litigation budget. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 8:10 am
IAM (Joff Wild) didn't think so, but then went off on a tangent, as if the words Quillen/Webster were not in the vocabulary:Essentially none of this is much of a surprise. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 4:50 pm
" That's how Lemley referred to Quillen/Webster (over Clarke) until he did a 180 flip in "Rubber Stamp. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:23 am
"It don't impress me much. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 12:15 pm
Even though there has been a drop-off in applications during the recession, it hasn't helped examiners catch up. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 7:37 am
***Of Wegner, note the previous IPBiz post Harold Wegner takes a walk on the dark side which discusses, among other things, Wegner's earlier trip on the Quillen/Webster bandwagon:One recalls that Wegner was involved in the Quillen/Webster business:If one looks at the second paper of Quillen and Webster (wherein the 97% grant figure is "qualified", 12 Fed. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 11:46 pm
The Skvorecz case examines the meaning of a fundamental term used in claim drafting, the word "comprising. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 12:21 am
. 'I can understand what they're saying,' said Baylis, 'but there's no point filing for a patent at all if it can't be successfully utilised or defended.'to 271Blog-->For a European view different from that of MaxDrei:Trevor Baylis feels that the burden is on patent attorneys in the first instance to produce unambiguous paperwork. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 7:27 pm
A rambling story by John Schmid and Ben Poston titled Patent rejections soar as pressure on agency rises includes the text:"We're the ones who put ‘no' in innovation," goes a joke that circulates in the agency's corridors, according to an examiner who requested anonymity because the agency won't let examiners speak with reporters.At the same time, because of heavy turnover, the staff of examiners became younger and… [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 10:49 pm
McKenzie should wipe the dust bunnies from his eyes.Jaffe/Lerner stuff isn't reality. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 12:06 am
With Quillen and Webster's ramblings as a baseline, he couldn't miss. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 1:05 am
Because even weak patents are costly to challenge in court, they say the effect is to stifle real progress.The "patent quality" debate goes back to Quillen and Webster. [read post]
