Search for: "Trans States Airlines, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The problem that faced the Supreme Court was the lower court’s reliance on the case Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 2:24 pm by Kalvis Golde
Five years later, the court stated in Trans World Airlines v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:35 am by Joy Waltemath
Trans World Airlines, Inc., that a state law may “relate to” prices, routes, or services for preemption purposes even if its effect is only indirect, but that a state law connected to prices, routes, or services in “too tenuous, remote, or peripheral a manner” is not preempted. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 11:17 am by Mariah McGrogan and Veronica Miclot
In reaching its decision, the Third Circuit relied on the prior Supreme Court opinion, Trans World Airlines Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 7:04 am by Andrew Hamm
Memphis Light, Gas & Water 19-1388Issue: Whether Trans World Airlines Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 6:31 pm
  The Affected Dealers cite the 3d Circuit's opinion in In re Trans World Airlines, Inc., 322 F.3d 283 (3d Cir. 2003) to support their broad definition of "interests. [read post]
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed, finding that the USPS had demonstrated that accommodating Groff’s objection to Sunday shifts imposed a burden on other workers and thus carried more than a de minimis cost, thereby satisfying a standard established by the Supreme Court more than 45 years ago in Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 7:52 pm
Knox-Schillinger (In re Trans World Airlines, Inc.), 322 F.3d 283 (3d Cir. 2003) (pdf), had significantly enhanced (at least for bankruptcies filed in Pennsylvania, Delaware, and New Jersey) the ability of purchasers to buy a bankrupt debtor's assets "free and clear" of  "any interest," including potential successor liability claims arising under federal common law. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 7:52 pm
Knox-Schillinger (In re Trans World Airlines, Inc.), 322 F.3d 283 (3d Cir. 2003) (pdf), had significantly enhanced (at least for bankruptcies filed in Pennsylvania, Delaware, and New Jersey) the ability of purchasers to buy a bankrupt debtor's assets "free and clear" of  "any interest," including potential successor liability claims. [read post]