Search for: "Transport Designs, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 1,322
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The new Mergers & Acquisitions Safe Harbor policy is designed to incentivize acquiring companies to identify and report the acquired entity’s misconduct within six months of the transaction’s closing date. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 8:40 am
In the State of California, school buses have to meet high standards for design, construction, color and equipment. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 8:59 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Appeals Board Panel Decisions CAUTION: These WCAB panel decisions have not been designated a “significant panel decision” by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
Given FDR’s antipathy to competition, had the Supreme Court not declared the NIRA unconstitutional in 1935, U.S. antitrust might have been extinguished as a result of FDR’s all-time record-setting dozen years in office. 1937-1943: Robert Jackson and Thurman Arnold – An Antitrust Revival Instead, antitrust (including the FTC) was rescued, revived, and launched into a highly aggressive phase by unpredictable developments: in 1937, FDR was persuaded to reverse course and support… [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:47 am by Berniard Law Firm
Summary judgment is designed to enable judicial expediency and cost-effectiveness in the courts. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 7:37 pm by Anthony Zaller
”  Generally, travel time is considered compensable work hours where the employer requires its employees to meet at a designated place and use the employer’s designated transportation to and from the work site. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 3:57 am
Operations, Inc., Serial No. 90559208 (July 24, 2023) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 26th July the Court will hand-down judgment in R (on the application of PACCAR Inc and others) v Competition Appeal Tribunal and others [2023] UKSC 28. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
While some companies have made the argument successfully that they had no knowledge of a partner’s intentions to transport their goods to New York (Ortiz v Food Mach. of Am., Inc.) (2014 NY Slip Op. 31868[U] [Bronx Ct. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
Lifestyle Equities C.V. and another v Ahmed and another, heard 20th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 Secretary of State for Transport v Curzon Park Ltd and others, heard 19th April… [read post]