Search for: "USA v. Martin" Results 21 - 40 of 348
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
IPSO 01665-22 Paisley v Sunday Life, 12 Discrimination (2021), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy, Breach – sanction: publication of correction Statements in Open Court and Apologies As mentioned above, on 20 July 2022 the BBC made a statement in open court [pdf] apologising and agreeing to pay damages to Alexandra Pettifer for the false allegations made by Martin Bashir that the nanny had an affair with Prince… [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
One Hour Martinizing Dry Cleaning, 180 F. [read post]
Circuit Judge James Dennis wrote a strongly worded dissenting opinion arguing that the majority does violence to the text of the Lanham Act by expanding the statute into noncommercial political speech protected by the First Amendment (Alliance for Good Government v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 8:17 am by Linda O'Brien (CCH)
Thus, the judgment on the trademark infringement and false advertising claims were reversed and the case remanded (Select Comfort Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Cybersecurity Attacks: Regulatory and Practical Approach Towards Preventing Data Breach and Cyber-Attacks in USA, Seth Azubuike, Northeastern University, School of Law; Boston Bar Association; IAPP. [read post]
It remanded back to the district court to consider the infringement claim under the proper standard (Underwood v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
On 9 July 2021 Kenneth Martin J handed down judgment in the case of Nguyen v Hinsley [2021] WASC 220, striking out multiple parts of the defence and counterclaim, with leave to replead. [read post]
§ 1071, while ambiguous, favored the interpretation that a party dissatisfied with an initial TTAB decision, or any subsequent TTAB decision, retains the right to choose whether to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit or to a district court (Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. v. [read post]
§ 1071, while ambiguous, favored the interpretation that a party dissatisfied with an initial TTAB decision, or any subsequent TTAB decision, retains the right to choose whether to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit or to a district court (Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. v. [read post]
The appellate court affirmed, however, the grant of summary judgment with respect to publications occurring prior to March 2015 (Martin v. [read post]