Search for: "DOES 1-19" Results 381 - 400 of 19,570
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2008, 8:18 am
Congress previously decided that certain actions do not constitute patent infringements and this Act does not change that prior policy decision. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 5:04 am
See also Doe v Poritz, 142 N.J. 1, 74 (1995); R. 2:11-3(e)(2). [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:46 pm by Anthony Zaller
  Here are five actions by President Biden this week that stand to have a major impact on employers across the U.S.: 1. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 7:19 pm by David C. Swedelson
We at SwedelsonGottlieb are well aware of the impact that COVID-19 has had on our world and the fact that over 10,000,000 people filed for unemployment nationwide (so far). [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 10:06 am by Hannah Meakin (UK)
It does not provide EU law interpretation nor does it contain supervisory elements. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 5:08 am by Jesse Lamp
The bill does not, however, affect previous convictions for those charged before the July 1 cutoff. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:22 pm by Jon L. Gelman
 Modeling PredictionsThe Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) has extended its US COVID-19 forecasts through October 1. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
[…] Asserted claims 1 and 19 recited “a flash memory module which operates as sole memory of the received processed sound electrical signals” (sole memory limitation). [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:55 pm by Jon Sands
Benamor, No. 17-50308 (6-6-19)(Graber w/Bybee & Harpool). [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:39 am by Roel van Woudenberg
On 12 February 2008 the USPTO, not being competent under Rule 19(1)(2) PCT to receive the international application, transmitted the latter pursuant to Rule 19.4 PCT to the International Bureau of WIPO as receiving Office (IB/RO), which assigned it a new international application number (PCT/IB2005/004218) and informed the original applicant by communication dated 13 June 2008. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 8:44 am
Applications must be filed between October 1, 2009 and November 19, 2009.Tax returns must be filed between October 1, 2009 and January 19, 2010…. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:48 am by James M. Nicholas
While many human resource initiatives and compliance programs have been placed on the backburner in the face of COVID-19, it does not appear that California’s sexual harassment training mandate will be one of them. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
However, in the present case, the provisions of R 126(1) to (3) apply. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 7:52 am
In the Supreme Court category, why does Scalia outrank Thomas, why does Roberts come in only third, and why does Alito get no respect? [read post]
30 May 2020, 10:54 am by Jon L. Gelman
Recording a COVID-19 illness does not, of itself, mean that the employer has violated any OSHA standard. [read post]