Search for: "DOES 1-19" Results 4101 - 4120 of 19,430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2020, 10:36 am by HRWatchdog
Though the letter does not propose text for such an order, CalChamber expresses willingness to work with the Governor on this language. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 6:00 am by umbrella
To the best of my knowledge, she does not have any current medical condition that would place her at an increased risk of COVID-19 complications should she contract the virus. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 6:00 am by umbrella
To the best of my knowledge, she does not have any current medical condition that would place her at an increased risk of COVID-19 complications should she contract the virus. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 9:19 am by Bianca Saad
The ordinance does provide an exemption for employees who are “first responders,” or health care providers as defined in California Government Code section 12945.2. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 3:14 pm by Brett A. Overby
  At the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, many of the requests for reasonable accommodations arose from employees with medical conditions that placed them at higher risk if they contracted COVID-19. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 3:03 pm by Christine A. Amalfe
The bill expressly provides that it does not preempt existing state or local paid sick leave entitlements. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:06 am by Suzan Kern
  The proclamation has no effect whatsoever on the admission of people who hold temporary nonimmigrant visas, such as B-1/B-2, E-1 and E-2, F-1, H-1B, L-1, O-1, P-1, and TN visas. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am by Marty Lederman
  (ii) Second, we address the death penalty analogy that the SG invokes on the final page of his reply brief--an analogy that appears to have had traction with some readers, if our conversations are any indication. 1. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:15 am
Executive Order 12866, as amendedThe Department of State does not consider this final rule to be a "significantregulatory action" under Executive Order 12866, as amended, § 3(f), RegulatoryPlanning and Review. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
” In a 3—1 ruling, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) held that misclassifying workers as independent contractors does not violate federal labor law, reversing a past decision. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 1:51 am by Jeroen Willekens
Although this decision was cited with approval in some other decisions (see T 1875/06 of 8 January 2008, point 9; T 19/05 of 15 February 2012, point 2.3.2), its conclusions did not remain uncontested. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 7:00 am by John Jascob
In future years, he does not envision the PCAOB continuing to operate in a fully remote environment, particularly for some of the larger, more challenging audit reviews. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm by NL
Accordingly, I agree with [the claimants] that a breach of Article 1 has been established.Remedy The Claimants argued that the Court’s powers under s.3 HRA were sufficient to enable it to effectively rewrite s.19(3) of the 1973 Act to remedy the defect, the proposed form being:“…no claim shall be made if the relevant date falls at a time when the highway was not so maintainable and the highway does not become so maintainable within three years of that… [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm by NL
Accordingly, I agree with [the claimants] that a breach of Article 1 has been established.Remedy The Claimants argued that the Court’s powers under s.3 HRA were sufficient to enable it to effectively rewrite s.19(3) of the 1973 Act to remedy the defect, the proposed form being:“…no claim shall be made if the relevant date falls at a time when the highway was not so maintainable and the highway does not become so maintainable within three years of that… [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 5:50 am by Colby Pastre
Second, it has a flat 20 percent tax on individual income that does not apply to personal dividend income. [read post]