Search for: "DOES 1-19"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 19,431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
Held:1. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:33 pm
For example, does COVID-19 constitute an “act of God”? [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
These are framed in the broadly drawn and idealized language of Art. 19 of ICCPR.2. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Investigators also conducted inspections on Aug.15, 2018, and Dec. 19, 2019. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:35 am
Effective April 19, 2004.) [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 2:48 pm
Riane Konc, “The Myth of Paul Ryan,” McSweeney’s (Dec. 19, 2018). [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 6:59 am
Under mandatory OSHA rules in 29 CFR 1904, employers are responsible for recording work-related cases of COVID-19 illness on OSHA’s Form 300 logs if the following requirements are met: (1) the case is a confirmed case of COVID-19; (2) the case is work-related (as defined by 29 CFR 1904.5); and (3) the case involves one or more relevant recording criteria (set forth in 29 CFR 1904.7) (e.g., medical treatment, days away from work); Implement protections against… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 6:59 am
Under mandatory OSHA rules in 29 CFR 1904, employers are responsible for recording work-related cases of COVID-19 illness on OSHA’s Form 300 logs if the following requirements are met: (1) the case is a confirmed case of COVID-19; (2) the case is work-related (as defined by 29 CFR 1904.5); and (3) the case involves one or more relevant recording criteria (set forth in 29 CFR 1904.7) (e.g., medical treatment, days away from work); Implement protections against… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 6:59 am
Under mandatory OSHA rules in 29 CFR 1904, employers are responsible for recording work-related cases of COVID-19 illness on OSHA’s Form 300 logs if the following requirements are met: (1) the case is a confirmed case of COVID-19; (2) the case is work-related (as defined by 29 CFR 1904.5); and (3) the case involves one or more relevant recording criteria (set forth in 29 CFR 1904.7) (e.g., medical treatment, days away from work); Implement protections against… [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 1:54 am
Both kinds of rejections are for lack of novelty, not just obviousness (which is what "Rejection B", which does not relate to Claim 19, is about). [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 3:29 pm
Stay tuned for updates. [1] Although the CISA’s website, to which Executive Order N-33-20 cites, includes “Commercial Facilities” as a critical infrastructure, CISA’s March 19, 2020 guidance does not. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 9:09 am
This article does not address the potential impacts of the numerous other local, state and federal orders that have been issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including, without limitation, potential liability should an employee become ill, requirements regarding family leave, sick pay and other issues. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Given political tensions over the next COVID-19 relief package, eviction relief measures are unlikely to be enacted prior to the November election. [1] 42 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 9:02 pm
This does not mean, however, that a state cannot rank in the top 10 while still levying all the major taxes. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 9:07 am
__vfz=medium%3Dsharebar) does not change consumer, industry and government, nothing will. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Matter of Huang, 19 I&N Dec. 749, 753 (BIA 1988); Muller, 16 I&N Dec. 637. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:22 pm
[1] Ohio in The State of Ohio v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 2:23 pm
It is reposted below.May 19, 2021Inflation in Cuba 2010-2021Luis R. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 3:06 am
Governor can take only after prior approval of the Union [Sections 7(5), 19, 30(1)(b), 33(1) and 43(1)]. [read post]
