Search for: "LPS" Results 4401 - 4420 of 5,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm by Jed
., John Paul Mitchell Systems, Sexy Hair Concepts, Llc, The Proctor And Gamble Company, And Tigi Linea, Lp, (the “Brand Owners”) The Salons filed their initial complaint on July 1, 2010 and amended the complaint on September 10, 2010. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:48 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Cypress Marina (1/10/11, pub. 1/24/11) --- Cal.App.4th ----, 2011 WL 63101.Plaintiffs, who are labor organizations, an association of contractors, and two City of Marina taxpayers, prevailed in their action for declaratory and injunctive relief against Cypress Marina Heights LP (CMH). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:45 pm by John McFarland
This is not always the case, as illustrated by a recent case, Shell Oil Company SWEPI LP v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:42 am by Meyers Nave
North American Stainless LP, the United States Supreme Court unanimously held that the anti-retaliation provisions in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII") protected an individual from being terminated in retaliation for his fiancée's prior complaint of discrimination to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 9:09 am
North American Stainless, LP, a man was fired after his fiancée filed a sexual discrimination charge against their mutual employer. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:24 am by Ailyn Cabico
  The revised version of the Principles incorporate feedback from GPs, LPs and third parties in the industry to increase “focus, clarity and practicality. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:46 am by Securites Lawprof
The SEC today announced insider trading charges against Michael Cardillo, a former trader at the hedge fund investment adviser Galleon Management, LP, for trading ahead of September 2007 announced acquisition of 3Com Corp., and November 2007 announced acquisition of Axcan... [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The revised version of the Principals incorporate feedback from GPs, LPs and third parties in the industry to increase “focus, clarity and practicality. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 9:34 am by Larry Ribstein
This was a publicly traded LP in which a general partner’s board sought a merger of two related entities. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:42 pm by Steven G. Pearl
North American Stainless, LP, --- S.Ct. ----, 2011 WL 197638 (January 24, 2011), the Supreme Court of the United States held that an employee who alleged he was fired in retaliation for his fiancée’s filing of a Equal Employment Opportunity Commission complaint against their mutual employer could state a claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act since a reasonable worker might be dissuaded from engaging in protected activity if she knew that her fiancé would be… [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 8:06 am
North American Stainless, LP, the United States Supreme Court held that an employee who does not directly engage in a protected activity can still assert a claim for retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act as someone who falls within the "zone of interests" of protection afforded by the statute. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 1:31 am by Ben Vernia
In April of last year, we obtained a $520 million settlement with AstraZeneca LP and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP to resolve allegations that marketing of the anti-psychotic drug Seroquel for uses not approved as safe and effective by the FDA caused false claims to be submitted to federal health care programs. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 5:06 pm by Colin O'Keefe
North American Stainless, LP, while Kevin LaCroix has an insightful interview with Stanford Law Professor Joseph Grundfest on the state of securities class action litigation. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 2:33 pm by Sheppard Mullin
In 2003, both Eric Thompson and his fiancée, Miriam Regalado, were employed by North American Stainless, LP (“NAS”). [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 1:14 pm by Brian Van Vleck
North American Stainless, LP, the Supreme Court held that it is an unlawful employment practice under Title VII to terminate an employee's "close family member" in order to retaliate against her for filing a charge of discrimination with the EEOC. [read post]