Search for: "DOES 1-19" Results 4481 - 4500 of 19,431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2008, 7:17 am
(g) Open Meeting Law - Sections 19 through 25, inclusive, of chapter 30A. [read post]
However, this does not include (1) an airline; or (2) an employer that is party to an agreement with the airport that contains a worker rehire requirement. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 5:15 am by Alex Lee
These new COVID-19 related reasons provide eligibility for those who are unemployed, or unable to work because: the individual has been diagnosed with COVID–19 or is experiencing symptoms of COVID–19 and seeking a medical diagnosis; a member of the individual’s household has been diagnosed with COVID–19; the individual is providing care for a family member or a member of the individual’s household who has been diagnosed with… [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 5:15 am by Alex Lee
These new COVID-19 related reasons provide eligibility for those who are unemployed, or unable to work because: the individual has been diagnosed with COVID–19 or is experiencing symptoms of COVID–19 and seeking a medical diagnosis; a member of the individual’s household has been diagnosed with COVID–19; the individual is providing care for a family member or a member of the individual’s household who has been diagnosed with… [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 5:15 am by Alex Lee
These new COVID-19 related reasons provide eligibility for those who are unemployed, or unable to work because: the individual has been diagnosed with COVID–19 or is experiencing symptoms of COVID–19 and seeking a medical diagnosis; a member of the individual’s household has been diagnosed with COVID–19; the individual is providing care for a family member or a member of the individual’s household who has been diagnosed with… [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 6:51 am by Michael S. Levine and Meagan R. Cyrus
” According to the insurers, the phrase “direct physical loss” requires some “structural damage” to property, and that COVID-19 does not meet this threshold because it does not cause structural damage to property. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 9:25 am by Marcel Pemsel
Comment A few takeaways from this decision: 1. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Because Brundle's claim form was dated 12 March 2013, before the new scale costs applied on 1 October 2013, the judge held that it would be the old scale costs that would apply, notwithstanding that, in December 2013, Mr Perry's counterclaim for infringement was dated after 1 October 2013, in December 2013. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:03 am
This does not seem to give much time to consider such far-reaching proposals. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 7:02 am by John Jascob
It also does not prohibit the court from deciding the personal jurisdiction issue while an investigation is ongoing. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 9:14 am
Does “know how“ need to be patentable ? [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 1:09 am by Jani Ihalainen
The German entity in itself does not hold any stock, but orders them when needed from the French entity. [read post]