Search for: "DOES 1-19" Results 4641 - 4660 of 19,431
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The report is interesting and does answer a question that does come up from time to time. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 2:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
Olszewski filed an appeal, which she later withdrew on November 1, 2019. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 3:30 pm by Josh Blackman
The Court rescinded its March 19, 2020 and April 15, 2020 orders, subject to a few caveats. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 9:00 pm
  The Act does not define “farm land”, but one of the prescribed requirements is that Section 19(5) of the Act applies to the land. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 9:00 pm
  The Act does not define “farm land”, but one of the prescribed requirements is that Section 19(5) of the Act applies to the land. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 8:09 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
That decision in Reference re Subsection 18.3(1) of the Federal Courts Act was just released, and focused on two questions: Does Google, in the operation of its search engine service, collect, use or disclose personal information in the course of commercial activities within the meaning of paragraph 4(1)(a) ofPIPEDA when it indexes webpages and presents search results in response to searches of an individual’s name? [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  The full judgment in the case of Robert Stewart Moore and Kayla Moore v Sacha Noam Baron Cohen, Case 1:19-cv-04977-JPC is available here [pdf]. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 8:56 am
  Interview Questions and Answers Payman Yazdani and Larry Catá Backer 15 July 2021   1-China has achieved great economic development without following the model that liberalism offers. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 11:59 am by Kristi Wolff and Jaclyn Metzinger
The dietary supplement and personal care product space continued to see enforcement on false CBD, COVID, and fertility claims as well as related litigation involving “germ-killing” claims on hand sanitizers and wipes. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
It appears to be simple enough. 4 NYCRR 5.3[1]provides that except as otherwise provide therein, "every resignation shall be in writing" while §31(2) of the Public Officers Law requires that "[e]very resignation shall be in writing addressed to the officer or body to whom it is made. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
It appears to be simple enough. 4 NYCRR 5.3[1]provides that except as otherwise provide therein, "every resignation shall be in writing" while §31(2) of the Public Officers Law requires that "[e]very resignation shall be in writing addressed to the officer or body to whom it is made. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
It appears to be simple enough. 4 NYCRR 5.3[1]provides that except as otherwise provide therein, "every resignation shall be in writing" while §31(2) of the Public Officers Law requires that "[e]very resignation shall be in writing addressed to the officer or body to whom it is made. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
It appears to be simple enough. 4 NYCRR 5.3[1]provides that except as otherwise provide therein, "every resignation shall be in writing" while §31(2) of the Public Officers Law requires that "[e]very resignation shall be in writing addressed to the officer or body to whom it is made. [read post]