Search for: "General Electric CO." Results 461 - 480 of 2,478
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2009, 3:46 pm
On December 1, 2009, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea (“Samsung”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:03 am
General Electric Co. raises that issue in the case from New Hampshire. [read post]
25 Sep 2006, 7:22 am by Veronica
In this per curiam opinion, the Court held that General Electric did not knowingly waive its contractual right to a non-jury trial. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 5:15 am
The main parties in the case are brothers that are 50-50 co-owners and the exclusive directors of Maynard. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:00 am
Emerson Electric Co., Oppositions Nos. 91158891 and 91158941 (March 23, 2007) [precedential], it ruled that Opposer B&D had established a family of "HOG" marks for power-operated outdoor equipment. [read post]
16 May 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
It originally opened in 1962 as a General Motors assembly plant. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 7:34 am by Nicholas T. Solosky
  The Contracting Officer (CO) thereafter directed the contractor to remedy the defect by removing the improperly rated plywood and installing fire-rated plywood in all rooms (not just those with electrical equipment). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:31 am by Lyle Denniston
  However, those individuals or groups who believe that such a hands-off ruling by EPA would fail to fulfill the Act’s mandate can then go to court to seek a ruling on what the Act does, in fact, require, the Court made clear in the decision in American Electric Power Co., et al., v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 2:06 am
The IPKat was very excited when he read earlier this week about the Memorandum of Understanding concluded between the European Patent Office (EPO) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Inc Standards Association (IEEE-SA). [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 10:49 am by Jason A. Johns
  The court agreed with TXU, holding that TXU’s transmission obligations arose only when the FPL-generated electricity actually reached the Delivery Point. [read post]