Search for: "DOES 1-19"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 18,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2020, 10:15 am
Legislative attorneys have said the state constitution does not allow for remote voting. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
Sept. 19, 2003); Audrisch v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 5:49 pm
Jan. 19, 2006) (Ward, J.) [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
The assertion of the petitioner that in the present case the Board had misunderstood the explanations of the petitioner that were relevant for the decision and, therefore (or for what reasons ever), had not taken them into account as would have been required by the right to be heard (A 113(1)) does not have any support. [9] Therefore, the decision on the present petition does not require the Board to dwell on the question of whether a misunderstanding of the kind alleged… [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
Lord Lane went on to conclude that so long as 24 (1) is applied proportionately, that does not render detention prior to a decision of whether or not to deport disproportionate. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 8:17 am
As vaccination rates increase and cases/deaths decrease in the coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic, many things begin to return to something akin to pre-pandemic normality. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:13 am
The IOAS exception does NOT apply. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 10:21 pm
Without this amendment, item 19 captures accounts with non-financial institutions which were not intended to be covered by the AML/CTF Act. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 5:07 am
July 19, 2013). [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:42 pm
., appeals the final written decisionof the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in an inter partes review of claims 1, 6–9, and 19 of U.S. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:27 pm
” (Principle 1, emphasis added.) [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 1:03 am
When determining the patentability of a product and/or its use, key questions are therefore: 1) Is the claimed product known? [read post]
6 May 2015, 6:01 pm
Successor Letters of Trusteeship issued to him on January 19, 2007, and he is now serving as a co-trustee along with petitioner and the daughter. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:51 pm
., 69 F.4th 1093 (9th Cir. 2023);1 Steinberg v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 6:00 am
Again, the law does not articulate a definitive test for what this might mean. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:39 pm
Article 33 does not explicitly require that a ‘(party with) real interest’ or ‘qualified reasoning’ file an opposition. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
On December 19, 2019, a New York federal district court judge denied the U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am
According to XYPN, the interpretive release, thus, runs afoul of a 2-1 decision by the D.C. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
Our next “Immigration Q & A Forum” is scheduled for Friday, July 19, 2013! [read post]
