Search for: "Does 1-188"
Results 541 - 560
of 688
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2010, 7:25 am
It amounts to approximately 7% of contract spending from the Stimulus bill (which does not include tax benefits), and 2.6% of the total stimulus money paid to date. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
The aftermath of Copenhagen: does international law have a role to play in a global response to climate change? [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 9:43 am
Sentencing Guidelines] § 2G2(b)(1). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:54 am
Rptr. 3d 184, 188 (Cal. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 9:25 am
Slip op. at 1.For those who are interested in public employment issues, the opinion is available here. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 2:50 pm
Second, even if the buyer had constructive notice of the existence of the deeds of trust on the property, this does not eliminate all of the duties of disclosure on the part of a seller or its agents. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
The total cleanup costs and damages for the Green Bay Site are expected to exceed $1 billion. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
The total cleanup costs and damages for the Green Bay Site are expected to exceed $1 billion. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
The total cleanup costs and damages for the Green Bay Site are expected to exceed $1 billion. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:15 am
No. 10-188. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm
The idea that shareholders have the right to make the final decision about an unsolicited tender offer does not necessarily follow, for example, from the mere fact that shareholders have voting rights. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
Insofar as these comments make reference to the said communication of 15 November 2007, they acknowledge that the mathematical expression “1 - hp(x,l)” which appears in claim 1 of what is still the appellant’s main request is erroneous. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:13 am
Patel Engineering Ltd. and Another (2006 AIR (SC) 450: 2005 (3) ArbLR 285: 2005 (8) SCC 618: 2005 (9) Scale 1: 2005 (9) JT 219: 2005 (7) Supreme 610: 2005 (7) SCJ 461: 2005 (5) CTC 302). [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:51 am
Patel Engineering Ltd. and Another (2006 AIR (SC) 450: 2005 (3) ArbLR 285: 2005 (8) SCC 618: 2005 (9) Scale 1: 2005 (9) JT 219: 2005 (7) Supreme 610: 2005 (7) SCJ 461: 2005 (5) CTC 302). [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
Pennsylvania precedent does not support the public nuisance claim plaintiffs advance here, and we cannot predict that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will choose to expand state public nuisance law in the manner plaintiffs urge.Id. at 421 (citations to Lead Industries, Leo, and Camden omitted)In Sheridan v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:11 am
Rev. 173, 188, 191 (2005). [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 5:40 pm
We think it does not. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:19 pm
(The city does, however, promptly and efficiently remove gang graffiti from anywhere it is publicly visible, a policy of which I approve and from which I have personally benefited.)With one exception, every single invocation delivered since this policy was adopted (and many delivered before it was adopted) has been sectarian, and I have no doubt whatsoever that this is just how the City Council likes it as the majority faction on the board all wear their religion on their sleeves. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am
These ATTM allies argue that it does not matter what the evidence in a case would show, that it does not matter what the state law at issue says, and that there is simply a federal right for any corporation to put in any contract a term that bans class actions (so long as the contract includes an arbitration clause). [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 5:18 am
Bettenhauser, 95 NY2d 185, 188-189 (2000); Handelsman v. [read post]
