Search for: ""Anders v. California" OR "386 U.S. 738""
Results 41 - 46
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2009, 12:09 pm
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), that appointed defense counsel may withdraw from “frivolous” criminal appeals, and held that “in any direct criminal appeal as a matter of right, counsel must submit an advocative brief in accordance with Indiana Appellate Rule 46. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and remanded to the district court to amend its written judgment were the judgment failed to include any reasons for the court’s upward departure from the guidelines range, agreeing with the Second Circuit in U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 6:49 am
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) on the ground that there are no non-frivolous grounds for appeal. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 10:10 am
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). * * * Most frivolous criminal appeals are offered by the attorney because the defendant wanted the lawyer to appeal. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 5:34 pm
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), on the ground that there is no non-frivolous basis for appeal. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 10:01 am
§ 2.HELD: Under reasoning of Anders v. [read post]
