Search for: ""Blakely v. Washington" OR "542 U.S. 296""
Results 41 - 49
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2016, 7:38 am
Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 304 (2004), which holds that the Sixth Amendment prohibits a judge from inflicting punishment that the jury’s verdict does not allow. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 2:26 pm
Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 7:43 am
Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 303 (2004), clarified that Apprendicreated a bright-line rule prohibiting the trial court from imposing a sentence beyond the `maximum sentence it may impose solely on the basis of the facts reflected in the jury verdict or admitted by the defendant. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 8:14 am
Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004). [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:48 pm
Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 304, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:07 am
Washington, 542 U.S.296 (2004) (Striking down Washington’s criminal sentencing procedures that allowed a judge rather than a jury to make findings that increased the penalty beyond the statutory maximum.) [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
California (2007) 549 U.S.__ [127 S.Ct. 856] (Cunningham), compelling reduction of the sentence to the midterm. [read post]
