Search for: ""Teague v. Lane" OR "489 U.S. 288""
Results 41 - 47
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2011, 8:54 pm
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), a new rule may not be applied retroactively unless it falls into one of two exceptions that plainly do not encompass the Padilla holding. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:20 pm
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), a new rule may not be applied retroactively unless it falls into one of two exceptions that plainly do not encompass the Padilla holding. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 3:53 pm
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), must be given “retroactive effect” in cases where direct review was complete when Miller was decided. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 11:36 am
Undisclosed evidence violated DOJ policy but did not rise to the level of a Brady violation where the evidence was cumulative and otherwise available to the defendant U.S. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 11:56 am
489 U.S. 288, 301 (1989)(holding that to impart retroactivity, a rule must be supported by ample existing precedent). [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:53 pm
Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 311-312 (1989). [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 2:32 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
