Search for: "A. C."
Results 41 - 60
of 170,312
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2024, 10:41 am
The Utah Supreme Court reversed an order of disqualification in trust litigation C. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 10:23 am
C-26 is not identical to US national security laws. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 10:00 am
These countries are: Algeria, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Djibouti, Egypt, Ethiopia, Libya, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Somalia, and Sudan. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 9:36 am
(B&C®) and The Acta Group (Acta®) for “Sponsor’s Role in Regulatory Testing — Complying with GLP Standards,” a complimentary webinar covering the roles and responsibilities of Study Sponsors, as defined by Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) regulations and related advisory documents, The post New Date – June 13, 2024 – “Sponsor’s Role in Regulatory Testing” Webinar; Registration Open appeared first on Bergeson & Campbell,… [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 9:36 am
(B&C®) and The Acta Group (Acta®) for “Sponsor’s Role in Regulatory Testing — Complying with GLP Standards,” a complimentary webinar covering the roles and responsibilities of Study Sponsors, as defined by Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) regulations and related advisory documents, The post New Date – June 13, 2024 – “Sponsor’s Role in Regulatory Testing” Webinar; Registration Open appeared first on Bergeson & Campbell,… [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 8:04 am
" "C'mon, be a mensch. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 8:04 am
Call DLP. (570) C-A-L-L-D-L-P. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:22 am
Call DLP. (570) C-A-L-L-D-L-P. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am
Call Now 1-866-939-5940Overview of the Offence Voyeurism is covered under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada: 162 (1) Every one commits an offence who, surreptitiously, observes — including by mechanical or electronic means — or makes a visual recording of a person who is in circumstances that give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy, if (a) the person is in a place in which a person can reasonably be expected to be nude, to expose his or her genital organs… [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:05 am
15-291(c). [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 6:58 am
This change will make 13 C.F.R. 127.202(c)(1) and (2) match the SDVOSB language at 13 C.F.R. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 6:26 am
C., de Sherbinin, A., Wendling, Z. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 6:14 am
Much like Bill C-18, there are a few winners, more losers, and many left to wonder if years of lobbying was worth the trouble. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
Call Now 1-866-939-5940Overview of the Offence The relevant provision for child pornography in the Code is 163.1 (1): 163.1 (1) In this section, child pornography means (a) a photographic, film, video or other visual representation, whether or not it was made by electronic or mechanical means, (i) that shows a person who is or is depicted as being under the age of eighteen years and is engaged in or is depicted as engaged in explicit sexual activity, or (ii) the… [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:27 am
However, some defences to a charge of child luring may include the following: Reasonable Steps were taken; Entrapment; Lack of intention; and Any applicable Charter defences Reasonable Steps Under s.172.1(4) of the Criminal Code: It is not a defence to a charge under paragraph (1) (a) [child luring – under 18 years], (b) [child luring – under 16 years] or (c) [child luring – under 14 years] that the accused believed that the person referred to in that… [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:01 am
Benjamin C. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 3:32 am
Con ello, básicamente tenemos: a) un primer bloque de cuestiones que se someten al silencio negativo por disponerlo expresamente la Ley formal, caso de la Ley 14/2000, de 29 de diciembre, de Medidas fiscales, administrativas y del orden social (disposición adicional vigésima novena, 1 y Anexo 2), e indirectamente al establecer los supuestos de procedimientos que se consideran no iniciados de oficio negativo (disposición adicional vigésima novena, 2). b) un segundo… [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 3:25 am
Richard C. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
Dain C. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:00 am
The CJEU has clarified on several occasions that the assessment of the allegedly generic nature of the single terms of a composite name is exclusively a matter for the national courts (C-132/05; see The IPKat here; C-465/02). [read post]
