Search for: "Ace European Group Ltd." Results 41 - 60 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am by INFORRM
The decision of Binchy J in Muwema v Facebook Ireland Ltd [2016] IEHC 519 (23 August 2016) demonstrates that, on the question of the liability of internet intermediaries for defamatory posts on their platforms, an important part of the answer is provided by application of the defence of innocent publication provided in section 27 of the Defamation Act 2009 (also here). [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 9:43 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti, heard 12-13 Jun 2019. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:05 pm
The claimants, Emerald Suppliers Ltd, imported cut flowers from Colombia and Kenya using the air freight services of BA and other international airlines. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known as Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd, heard 12-13 November 2019. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 3:46 am by INFORRM
Personal injury was argued not to be a proper guide for awarding damages in libel relying on the judgment of Lord Hoffman in the Privy Council in The Gleaner Co Ltd v Abrahams [2004] 1 AC 628. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down its long awaited judgment in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd & Anor [2019] UKSC 27. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
As all the fine Private International Law practitioners reading this post will know, forum non conveniens requires the Court’s consideration of the test set out by Lord Goff of Chieveley in Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd [1987] AC 460. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:09 am by Matrix Law
Ltd v Babco Forwarding & Shipping (UK) Ltd. [1978] AC 141 (“Buchanan”), the House of Lords decided by a 3:2 majority that the broad interpretation should be adopted. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
The rule stands as an exception to the general practice governing applications for interim injunctions in civil proceedings established in American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd ([1975] AC 396 (HL)), whereby the court considers whether there is a serious issue to be tried and, if so, where the balance of convenience or justice lies. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
In that context, it has been held that “the values enshrined in Articles 8 and 10 are now part of the cause of action for breach of confidence” (See Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 at [17] (Lord Nicholls) and that it is necessary to consider Strasbourg jurisprudence to establish the scope of that domestic cause of action, since those Articles are now “not merely of persuasive or parallel effect” but are “the very… [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:54 am by INFORRM
The man successfully applied for an injunction to stop publication arguing that it would interfere with his attempts to rebuild his family life (ETK and News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 439). [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:56 am by charonqc
He defended the last two cases brought for blasphemy in the UK against Salman Rushdie (R (ex parte Choudhury) v Bow Street Magistrates Court [1991] 1 QB 429) and Gay News (R v Gay News Ltd [1979] AC 617). [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:17 am by Charon QC
I have fond memories of Dorset Yacht Co Ltd v Home Office [1970] AC 1004 from my days as a law student. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Over the past several years, the use of non-disclosure agreements (“NDAs”) has received significant public scrutiny following their controversial use in a number of high profile harassment claims.[1] NDAs were back in the headlines earlier this year following the leak to the Telegraph of around 100,000 Whatsapp messages belonging to the former UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock.[2] The messages, which revealed Mr Hancock’s communications with other members of the government during… [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
Thirdly, clauses 4(3)(b) & (d) would relieve courts of the cl.4(1) obligation to give great weight to the importance of freedom of speech in cases relating to alleged breaches of confidence where the duty of confidentiality was said to arise from a contract – including, it would seem, in the employment context, non-disclosure agreements (‘NDAs’), which have been criticised as being against the public interest (see ABC v Telegraph Group Ltd [2019] EMLR 5 (CA)… [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm by INFORRM
This was not disclosed in the public version of the judgment for the reasons summarised by the House of Lords in Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee [2005] 1 AC 253 at [26], namely so as not to pre-empt publication and because doing so would mean that the Claimant “[...] could not bring an action at all without disclosing his private or confidential information, and so defeating the purpose of the proceedings. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Misuse of Private Information (Article 10) – That it is doubtful whether there can any Article 10 rights in relation to information concerning the claimant’s sexual behaviour, disclosure of which would contribute nothing to any debate of general interest  in a democratic society: Von Hannover v Germany [2004] EMLR 21 (European Court of Human Rights), confirmed in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26, [2016] AC 1081. [read post]