Search for: "Americans for Clean Energy v. EPA"
Results 41 - 60
of 315
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2022, 9:08 pm
” The majority holds that because EPA’s rules attempted to “substantially restructure the American energy market,” the case falls under the major questions doctrine. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 7:13 am
Under EPA’s view of the statute, Roberts says, “Congress implicitly tasked it, and it alone, with balancing the many vital considerations of national policy implicated in deciding how Americans will get their energy. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:52 am
The Court ruled that by arguing that Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act “empowers it to substantially restructure the American energy market,” the EPA found “newfound power” in the “vague language” of a provision that was designed to function as a gap filler and had rarely been used in preceding decades. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:11 am
That’s where it sat until 2019, when the Trump administration outright rescinded it and replaced it with the more lenient Affordable Clean Energy (“ACE”) Rule. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:47 pm
In arguing that Section 111(d) empowers it to substantially restructure the American energy market, EPA "claim[ed] to discover in a long-extant statute an unheralded power" representing a "transformative expansion in [its] regulatory authority. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 8:24 am
Was Woodrow Wilson at all relevant to the major questions doctrine, or the Clean Air Act. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 5:57 am
In FDA v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
EPA All this set the stage for West Virginia v. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
EPA, the Supreme Court held that the emission limits adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the Clean Power Plan exceeded the agency’s authority, because the Clean Air Act did not clearly authorize the agency to “restructure the American energy market. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
Deputy Transportation Secretary Polly Trottenberg explained that the designation aims to encourage “a robust U.S. offshore wind industry to help bring costs down for American families and build a clean energy future. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm
EPA, the Supreme Court said this: The dissent also cites our decision in American Elec. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:57 am
” But with the CPP, Roberts observed, the EPA sought to rely on Section 7411 to exercise “unprecedented power over American industry. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:59 am
” New York v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:03 am
Environmental Protection Agency The court must decide whether the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the statutory authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions as it considers cost, non-air impacts, and energy requirements, or if those EPA powers were limited by Congress under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 9:10 pm
The Clean Water Act empowered EPA to control pollution discharged into “navigable waters. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm
” WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a report by the Global Commission on People-Centred Clean Energy Transitions, a group established by the International Energy Agency, the commission provided clean energy transition recommendations to governments. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 2:08 pm
The case, West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 3:03 pm
Moreover, they add, in its 2011 decision in American Electric Power v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
In American Lung Association v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY City of Duarte v. [read post]
