Search for: "Ana Santos Rutschman"
Results 41 - 52
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2020, 8:32 am
Ana Santos Rutschman: Regulatory Malfunctions in the Drug Patent Ecosystem (S0urce: SSRN) New Job Postings on Patently-O: Servilla Whitney LLC ALG Intellectual Property, LLC [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 1:01 pm
30 Mar 2020, 1:55 pm
Ana Santos Rutschman: The Mosaic of Coronavirus Vaccine Development: Systemic Failures in Vaccine Innovation (Source: SSRN) Prof. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 5:04 pm
The article draws on the expertise of four professors, Ana Santos Rutschman, Lisa Larrimore Ouellette, Mark Cohen and Jacob Sherkow. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm
The development of new vaccines is a key strategy to helping reduce the scale and public health impact of future outbreaks of infectious diseases—and intellectual property (IP) plays a key role in vaccine development, Ana Santos Rutschman of Saint Louis University School of Law argues. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 6:00 pm
Ana Santos Rutschman: From Venetian Glass to Contemporary Intellectual Property: Revisiting Tailored Patent Regimes (Book Review) (Source: SSRN) Daniel H. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 3:30 am
Ana Santos Rutschman The apparent one-size-fits-all configuration of contemporary intellectual property systems has troubled many a scholar. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 6:00 am
Ana Santos Rutschman: The Vaccine Race in the 21st Century (Source: SSRN) New Job Postings on Patently-O: Samsung Daly, Crowley, Mofford & Durkee, LLP Harrity & Harrity, LLP Bookoff McAndrews (BoMc) [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Here is the schedule for the 2019 Health Law Professors Conference. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:00 am
Emory University School of Law – Ana Santos Rutschman, Assistant Professor, Saint Louis University School of Law, presents today as part of the Faculty Colloquium Series. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:25 am
The following is a guest post from Ana Santos Rutschman, the Jaharis Faculty Fellow in Health Law and IP at DePaul. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
In TC Heartland, the accused infringer has asked the Supreme Court to reset the law of venue and give effect to the statutory statement that infringement actions be brought either (1) “in the judicial district where the defendant resides” or (2)” where the defendant has committed acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business. [read post]
