Search for: "BVS, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 222
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2020, 12:56 pm
See Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 12:26 pm
In addition, I believe Romag Fasteners, Inc., Petitioner v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 5:29 am
These provocative policy questions at the heart of hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 5:39 am
Yes.RooR International Bv and Sream, Inc (collectively "RooR") have filed dozens (more? [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 5:39 am
Yes.RooR International Bv and Sream, Inc (collectively "RooR") have filed dozens (more? [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
GuestKat Cecilia Sbrolli writes Seal the deal: Canadian court waxes off copyright infringement in Pyrrha Design Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 3:06 am
RGF Environmental Group, Inc., Opposition No. 91232746 [Opposition to registration of UPCO-QR for "Air purification units" in view of the registered mark APCO for the same goods].Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog note: Any predictions? [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:27 am
This was summarised by HHJ Hacon as a "basic principle of patent law in the United Kingdom" and cited Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical Inc v H. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
2018 was another busy busy year in the world of copyright, and a continuing global 'theme' was the ongoing battle between 'big tech' and 'big content', with the likes of Google and YouTube continuing to lobby extensively against planned reforms, bringing onboard (some) of the creative community - whilst the 'big content' (including film companies, music companies, the games sector and television) rolled out other creators - and finally seemed to be… [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
To be Frank, Nike’s lost out in LDNR LNDR Londoner mix-upFrank Industries PTY Ltd v Nike Retail BV [2018] EWHC 1893, High Court of England and Wales (July 2018)I covered the preliminary injunction won by Frank Industries in this case in Volume III. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
A happy outcome in the United States was the decision here in Christian Louboutin S.A. v Yves Saint Laurent America Inc., No. 11-3303 (2d Cir. 2012) 1 ‘…the Red Sole Mark has acquired limited secondary meaning as a distinctive symbol that identifies the Louboutin brand, and…it is therefore a valid and protectable mark…’ (page 25) here.A second problem featured in the recent decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Christian… [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 8:44 pm
• Defendants: Alvogen Pine Brook, LLC; Synthon BV; Synthon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and Synthon S.R.O Claim: Infringement of U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 11:40 pm
This article was written by Lovanya Moodley, Associate and Nkululeko Tselane, Candidate Attorney, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:45 am
" Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am
’” (page 31 – with reference to the well-known decision in Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 10:05 pm
Article 3(a): a spectrum of specificity The Court of Appeal reviewed the case law of the CJEU and pending references, focussing on Case C-322/10 Medeva BV v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks and Case C-493/12 Eli Lilly & Co Ltd v Human Genome Sciences Inc. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
When historians look back at the copyright worlf in 2017 (if our attention spans allow us to have roles such as a 'historian' in the future!) [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 9:59 pm
Inc. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 12:57 pm
ReDigi Inc, 934 FSupp2d 640, which considered whether the first sale doctrine defense applies to the resale of a digital music file in the marketplace ReDigi. [read post]
