Search for: "Barnett Personal Property, Specifically"
Results 41 - 60
of 106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
And, in his draft, not only do all persons have “certain . . . natural rights” of life, liberty, and property, but these rights cannot be taken away “by any compact. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 2:46 pm
The other reason I was immediately skeptical of MacLean’s take on Buchanan was because her portrayal of Buchanan did not mesh with my personal experience. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:42 am
” If the examiner finds that the meaning “refers to specific identifiable persons, institutions, beliefs or national symbols” then they must ask “whether that meaning may be disparaging to a substantial composite of the referenced group. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:42 am
” If the examiner finds that the meaning “refers to specific identifiable persons, institutions, beliefs or national symbols” then they must ask “whether that meaning may be disparaging to a substantial composite of the referenced group. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:42 am
” If the examiner finds that the meaning “refers to specific identifiable persons, institutions, beliefs or national symbols” then they must ask “whether that meaning may be disparaging to a substantial composite of the referenced group. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:59 pm
These are the stories elites like to tell themselves over what passes for the campfires of community bonding—academic conferences, meetings of eminent persons at national and international organizations, and the sausage making that is regulatory governance in this age—an age that might itself be coming to an end—of global regulatory networks that provide the basis of good order for transnational economic activity. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:26 pm
The “Restraints on Alienation” Concern is Ambiguous: The view that is generally espoused is that restraints on personal property are generally not enforced. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 9:39 am
Piggybacking on Jonathan Barnett’s Copyright Without Creators. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 6:25 pm
Barron sued Baltimore for a Fifth Amendment taking of his property, and lost on the holding that the Fifth Amendment did not apply to the states. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm
Online defamation was already a crime, but the new law makes specific provisions for the president. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 12:13 pm
Lewis bought his ex-wife’s interest in the Ponte Vedra Beach property as part of their divorce. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 2:42 pm
” This means that Bank of America (”BofAm”) was describing itself first as: (1) successor by merger to LaSalle Bank, a National Association, meaning that LaSalle merged into BofAm and BofAm was then the successor in interest of LaSalle’s property holdings; (2) including some Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, specifically the WMALT Series 2005-11, property which had been placed in trust with LaSalle, as as trustee. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 2:00 am
Every person who signed it would be executed as traitors should they be caught by the British. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
Division of Medical Assistance, 423 Mass. 399 (1996), the Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) held that the essence of federal Medicaid trust law was whether a creditor could reach the settlor-applicant’s interest in the trust, as Congress had implemented “Restatement (Second) of Trusts s. 156 (1959), which provides: “Where the Settlor is a Beneficiary . . . (2) Where a person creates for his own benefit a trust for support or a discretionary trust, his… [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
Ct. 439 (2009), which is known to have involved the appellant’s home held in the trust (as the Massachusetts Appeals Court specifically mentions the appellant’s right to live there), there is no mention whatsoever in the briefs filed at any level by or on behalf of the Office of Medicaid about Muriel Doherty’s home being a countable asset due to her living there and it therefore being “available” and per se countable. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:42 am
Barnett, “Why is Everyone Afraid of IP Licensing? [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
Private law does incentivize through property, but it’s generally not by telling people to produce/telling us it’s there for ensuring property owners they’ll make money. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 10:50 am
This specification makes perfect sense. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
Copyright © 2015 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:17 am
Coverture was abandoned as women gained legal, political, and property rights. [read post]
