Search for: "Burlington Northern Railway Co"
Results 41 - 60
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2010, 6:20 am
In In re Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co., No. 09-8023, Slip op. (7th Cir. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 12:03 pm
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co., 632 F. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm
The ARB formally adopted the Williams standard, which states that any nontrivial unfavorable employment action is an adverse action, but curiously the ARB also retained the Title VII Burlington Northern standard as a persuasive interpretive tool. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 3:11 pm
The ARB formally adopted the Williams standard, which states that any nontrivial unfavorable employment action is an adverse action, but curiously the ARB also retained the Title VII Burlington Northern standard as a persuasive interpretive tool. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 7:30 am
Burlington Northern Railroad Holdings, Inc., September 17, 2018, per curiam). [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:30 am
Rather, in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 2:48 pm
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co., 941 F.3d 331 (7th Cir. 2019) and EEOC v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 3:30 am
Title VII Retaliation Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
The 10 issues to watch are: Offshore wind power generation Renewable energy incentive programs Hydraulic fracturing regulation Aggregation Greenhouse gas litigation California's cap-and-trade program California's Green Chemistry program New mercury standards for coal and oil-burning power plants Fallout from CERCLA decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 4:01 am
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co., 535 F.3d 759 (7th Cir. 2008). [read post]
Fear obesity could lead to other conditions supports rejected applicant’s regarded-as disabled claim
8 Mar 2018, 6:59 am
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. , March 5, 2018, Coleman, S.). [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 11:52 am
Supreme Court decision in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:45 pm
The case involved two charges asserting Americans With Disabilities Act ("ADA") claims by individuals in Colorado against Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:02 pm
Supreme Court handed down its 8 to 1 decision in the much anticipated case of Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co., et al v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 3:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:34 pm
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co., 535 F.3d 759 (7th Cir. 2008)(Bullard plaintiffs request to a stipulation to a trial covering fewer than 100 plaintiffs required under CAFA for an action to be deemed a “mass action” did not impact CAFA jurisdiction.). [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 9:56 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Burlington Northern& Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 8:20 am
And, the Roberts Court also decided Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:28 am
The court refused to decide whether that element requires a showing of “material adversity” – as articulated for Title VII claims in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 7:47 am
The Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California secretly tested workers for sickle cell trait and other genetic disorders from the 1960s through 1993; workers were told it was routine cholesterol screening.In another incident, Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. paid 36 employees $2.2 million in 2002 to settle a lawsuit in which the workers claimed the company sought to genetically test them without their knowledge after they had submitted… [read post]
