Search for: "CAMPBELL v. HOLDER"
Results 41 - 60
of 166
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2019, 10:53 am
Despite the court’s punt on this issue, I believe the default position is that social media accounts are official accounts so long as the holder is in office. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:54 pm
” Id.; see Campbell v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
The Blog considered the ongoing case of Strike 3 Holdings in its efforts to subpoena the identity of an ISP holder in order to serve a claim against hm. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
Tingy (1800), Little v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm
” TVEyes also notes that the Court has not addressed fair use for over 20 years, since it articulated the doctrine of transformative use in the case of Campbell v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
The late playwright's son sued del Toro, the Fox Searchlight studio and others in February and Zindel v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 3:55 pm
" Marlow v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
., Bull v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
| Retromark Volume III: the last six months in trade marks | An IPSOC Q&A with Mr Justice Birss | The EU Commission proposes new whistle-blowing rules: should IP and trade secret holders tremble? [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
As to the latter, plaintiff contends that she meets the burden articulated by the Second Circuit in Brunner v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:06 am
The case at hand, Frank Industries v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:30 am
Pumfrey J has previously said (in Quads 4 Kids v Campbell [2006] EWHC 2482 (Ch)) that a Vero notice is "a clear arguable threat" and granted an interim injunction on this basis.More recently, (in Cassie Creations v Blackmore and Mirrorkool [2014] EWHC2941 (Ch) and T&A Textiles and Hosiery Limited v Hala Textile UK Limited[2015] EWHC 2888) it was suggested that arguing that an eBay Vero notice may be a threat is persuasive. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
A&M Records, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
See Dulong v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Circuit’s decision in Campbell v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 5:18 am
" Campbell, 510 U.S. at 580, 114 S.Ct. 1164. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:47 am
Supreme Court in the 2 Live Crew “parody” case Campbell v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 12:55 pm
Campbell, D.W. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:32 am
The Background The pursuer, Mr Campbell, was employed as an apprentice joiner by Peter Gordon Joiners Ltd. [read post]
