Search for: "D Sexton"
Results 41 - 60
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2010, 9:00 am
Griffith Sexton 90,000 250,000 0 0 340,000 Laura D. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
Griffith Sexton 75,000 250,000 — — — 325,000 Laura D. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:55 am
If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, or op-ed relating to the Court that you’d like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotusblog.com. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
Sexton v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:34 am
As I’d predicted — in fact, as anyone who saw the oral argument and hadn’t flatlined their last EEG could have predicted — the court ruled in favor of the state, but by a narrower vote than I’d figured. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
Sexton v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:16 pm
[09/18] Sexton v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 11:40 am
Remanded.Eric D. [read post]
2 May 2008, 11:03 am
Sexton, and T. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:12 pm
D. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:01 am
Billy D. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit violated the backward-looking nature of Section 2254(d) of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 and the clear mandates announced by the Supreme Court in Sexton v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 5:47 am
Ralph Medicine - Radiology - 42 Hodgins, Lewis Medicine - Anesthesiology - 43 Hoover, Kevin D. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
We'd expect nothing less.The first fascinating issue is the plaintiffs' purported "damages. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 1:00 pm
Sexton, 141 N.C. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:15 am
Income Tax Officer, Special Circle, D. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:23 am
The disciplinary action prohibited Jones from participating in debates for the rest of the day after House Speaker Cameron Sexton said Jones had spoken out of order twice. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 1:00 pm
Sexton, 141 N.C. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 11:59 am
(Malden, MA; John Sexton, President) 419 Walnut, Inc. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
Stitt, 17-765); a habeas issue (Sexton v. [read post]
