Search for: "D. & B. Corp." Results 41 - 60 of 3,878
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 4:37 am by Peter Mahler
The First Department also invalidated a self-interested director transaction in Sardanis v Sumitomo Corp. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:15 am by Kelly Hughes
Other notable filings include petitions challenging patents held by Softex [associated with SoftBank Group Corp.], Dental Imaging Technologies [associated with Envista Holdings Corporation], Resonant Systems [d/b/a RevelHMI], Immersion Corp, and Dsm IP Assets BV [associated with DSM-Firmenich AG]. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:15 am by Kelly Hughes
Other notable filings include petitions challenging patents held by Softex [associated with SoftBank Group Corp.], Dental Imaging Technologies [associated with Envista Holdings Corporation], Resonant Systems [d/b/a RevelHMI], Immersion Corp, and Dsm IP Assets BV [associated with DSM-Firmenich AG]. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am by Eugene Volokh
[The decision allows such pseudonymity when the defendant has already been found (by default judgment) to have committed the assault, but Judge Wilkinson's concurrence argues that, absent this unusual factor, one-sided pseudonymity should be frowned on.] [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
The Plaintiff sued the City of Philadelphia, Sears Holdings Corp. d/b/a Kmart and other Defendants. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Corp., 62 NY2d 75, the Court of Appeals held "FOIL imposes a broad duty on government agencies to make their records available to the public" and the exemption to disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(a)* relied on by Petitioner was not applicable. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Corp., 62 NY2d 75, the Court of Appeals held "FOIL imposes a broad duty on government agencies to make their records available to the public" and the exemption to disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(a)* relied on by Petitioner was not applicable. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On Jan. 16, the Supreme Court will hear argument in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:04 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/501(d)(3) After a divorce is finalized, motions for clarification become problematic. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Thus, “[b]ecause liability for each of these causes of action necessarily requires proof of willful conduct, coverage is barred by section 533. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am by Keith Szeliga
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing requirements that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
But this self-serving relationship between activist short-sellers and entrepreneurial plaintiff officers of the court is conflict-ridden and hinders the fact finder’s impartiality when a short report forms the basis for lead plaintiffs’ alleged violations of the federal securities laws under Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm by Dennis Crouch
These Wands factors include: (A) the breadth of the claims; (B) the nature of the invention; (C) the state of the prior art; (D) the level of one of ordinary skill; (E) the level of predictability in the art; (F) the amount of direction provided by the inventor; (G) the existence of working examples; and (H) the quantity of experimentation needed to make or use the invention based on the content of the disclosure. [read post]