Search for: "DOES I-XX"
Results 41 - 60
of 402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2014, 7:58 am
I would be very interested in colleagues' views on these questions. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 4:29 pm
XX(h) defence does not apply. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 10:39 am
None of the Nice class heading wording actually covers 100% of its class content, but they are mostly quite broad listings with some, I imagine, coming tantalisingly close to “All goods in class XX”. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 7:10 am
XX does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents which may arise as a result of its transmission. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:23 am
For all the reasons the measure violates Article I and does not satisfy the requirements of the Enabling Clause, it also constitutes unjustifiable discrimination, I would say. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 5:10 am
" Does that matter? [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 11:54 am
I like what they are trying to do here, although the text does not look like it is completely finished. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 9:35 am
Finally, the European Union would note that the correct interpretation of Articles I:1 and III:4 of the GATT 1994, which requires for de facto claims both a detrimental impact on imports and the determination that it does not stem exclusively from a legitimate regulatory distinction, also leaves significant space for Article XX. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 11:00 am
However, a failure to provide a full analysis of each issue does increase the risk of error. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 11:00 am
However, a failure to provide a full analysis of each issue does increase the risk of error. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:46 pm
But without a similar argument in the Rules of Origin Agreement section, does that mean they think GATT Article XX does apply there? [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 10:49 am
XX(b) can hardly offer an excuse. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 10:39 pm
Every state codifies their sex offense laws by defining the different types of sex offenses that are committed, hence, recognizing the differences in sex offenders.If states used the Broad" form of "sex offender" they would only need one statute, one that says, you committed a sex offense and the punishment is xx, there would not be any further breakdown of sex offenses.Accordingly, McCain's S-431 uses the "Broad form Sex Offenders" so that EVIDENCE will not be… [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:02 am
I still don't know much about the Trade Facilitation Agreement, but law prof Antonia Eliason does, and she has written an article about it. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:53 am
This is in line with the stricter disciplines imposed by the TBT Agreement, as compared with GATT Articles I:1 and III:4, where the possibility of invoking GATT Article XX remains open in de jure discrimination cases. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:27 am
I don't know anything about this, but if anyone else does, feel free to post in the comments. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:55 am
I also understand that XX does not require WTO Members to be fully consistent when pursuing their public morals objectives (only SPS 5.5 has a genuine consistency requirement). [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
XX, sec. 1). [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 9:56 am
, but I want to focus on an obscure interpretive point related to the necessity text under certain Article XX sub-provisions. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
I've often wondered how this kind of argument would do. [read post]
