Search for: "Davis v. Scope Services"
Results 41 - 60
of 368
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
” Because market makers can earn spreads with less risk on retail orders—in light of the typically smaller size and less market information driving retail orders—these wholesalers typically do not charge retail brokers fees for this service, and in fact often pay the retail brokers for the opportunity to trade with these retail orders (called “payment for order flow” or PFOF). [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm
First, in most cases, leave is not required before service, provided that the case comes within the scope of (new) defined grounds of direct jurisdiction: FCR r 10.42. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
Dykes v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:43 am
See Hizer v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:52 am
Davis denounces the OSB as no more than a ‘Censor’s Charter’. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:34 pm
GermanyDer Dritte Weg v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 9:33 am
For example, the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA), in Walsh/Davis Joint Venture v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am
Surveillance David Davis MP and others are calling for a ban on the Chinese surveillance camera brands Hikvision and Dahua, used by UK government bodies. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 4:51 pm
Judge Davis dissented and disagreed with all three holdings. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
Among them are Curtis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
Abbasi, 137 S.Ct. 1843, 1860 (2017); Correctional Services Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
Jennifer Davis: market for brands is huge and ongoing. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
In TM often done with validity v. scope, which will magically solve problems with validity or at least be someone else’s problem. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Registration v. acquisition is also a big deal. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
” “It is well settled that “[a]n attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of the retainer” (Genesis Merchant Partners, L.P. v Gilbride, Tusa, Last & Spellane, LLC, 157 AD3d 479,482 [1st Dept 2018], citingAmbase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
It may be that in this regard Clibbery v Allan is now a dead letter and that Lykiardopulo was wrongly decided. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 10:10 am
Concerns about not knowing where crowdfunding donations were coming from led to the government taking quick action to broaden the scope of Canada’s AML rules. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 5:05 am
Davis, 132 F.3d 1092 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
Davies v. [read post]
