Search for: "Day v. Genuine Parts Company" Results 41 - 60 of 552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2014, 6:37 am by Joy Waltemath
In order to satisfy this “most important” factor, the parent company had to exert a certain amount of control over the subsidiary’s day-to-day employment decisions. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:49 am by Peter Mahler
In 2006, Peter left Piccinini to pursue a day-trader career and sold his shares to brothers Paul and Richard, making them 50/50 owners. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 10:40 am by Peter Thompson & Associates
As part of its regular business, the company maintained an agreement with the truck rental company to transfer rental trucks to and from locations in exchange for payment. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:54 pm
Google followed suit a couple of days later. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Mr Whitehouse formed a company in 2011, BMWAssociates, for his “little one-man band telecom railway company”. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 10:40 am by Peter Thompson & Associates
As part of its regular business, the company maintained an agreement with the truck rental company to transfer rental trucks to and from locations in exchange for payment. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:05 am by Above the Law
It’s no wonder that “[v]irtually all of the associates want to work for Rich [Ruben],” a Jones Day litigation partner. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 11:23 am by Tobin Admin
In June 2012, the security company hired the plaintiff to work as a safety officer at the condo association. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:24 am
 The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd [2015] EWHC 1773 (IPEC), a 29 June decision of Judge Richard Hacon in the increasingly impressive and cost-effective Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, is impressive not only in its length (123 paragraphs) but also for the fact that the court was able to deal with so many legal and evidential issues in just two hearing days. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Hourani v Thomson & Ors ([2017] EWHC 432 (QB)) a businessman who was the target of a “sustained, highly sophisticated, cynical and calculated” campaign was awarded £80,000 in damages for defamation and harassment following a 10 day trial in the High Court. [read post]