Search for: "Doe Waterford"
Results 41 - 60
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2009, 4:23 am
Oh, what memories…So you ask, what does the title of this post have to do with anything? [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 12:01 am
What, you may ask, does time have to do with longitude? [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 2:51 pm
Fitzpatrick Lecture in Legal Bibliography, DublinDetails at http://www.lawsociety.ie/Courses--Events/Other-Events/Events/Hugh-M-Fitzpatrick-Lecture-in-Legal-Bibliography2/Wed. 2 Dec. 2015:Constitutionalising Labour Rights - Professor Judy Fudge, UCD Sutherland School of LawDetails at http://www.ucd.ie/law/eventsseminars/title,258804,en.htmlThu. 3 Dec. 2015:Using the Law to Secure Social Justice - Lecture by Michael Farrell, FLAC,… [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 9:04 am
Apr. 19, 2011), the plaintiff sued to prevent the operator of the Millstone Nuclear Power Station in Waterford from implementing its plan to increase its pwer generating capacity in its Unit 3 reactor by 7%. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:08 am
High Court, McKeogh v Doe [2012] IEHC 95 [defamation, privacy, right to good name, video removal, Norwich Pharmacal orders.] [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Against this body of case law, PCCM pointed to judgments in several other common law jurisdictions, including: Ireland: C&A Modes v C&A (Waterford) Ltd which Lord Neuberger said [39] shows a “misapprehension” of the reasoning in Crazy Horse; Canada: Orkin Exterminating Co Inc v Pestco Co of Canada Ltd, which was “of no assistance” [40] since the US-based plaintiff had thousands of customers in CanadaNew Zealand: Dominion Rent A Car Ltd v Budget Rent A… [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
Oh, what memories…So you ask, what does the title of this post have to do with anything? [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:46 am
This does not, however, mean that there is nothing left to fight for. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:14 am
Alan did not know then and does not know now what that was but says he refused and that since then he has been subjected to harassment and abuse. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
Oh, what memories…So you ask, what does the title of this post have to do with anything? [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
Oh, what memories…So you ask, what does the title of this post have to do with anything? [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 1:06 am
It is rare for the advice of the DAC and CBC not to coincide, and when it does the Court must consider the dissonance with great care. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 6:51 pm
Some of the main problems that were identified include the following: disclosure does not ‘solve’ the complexity in financial services; disclosure must compete for consumer attention and influence; one size disclosure does not fit all – the effects of disclosure are different from person to person and situation to situation; disclosure can backfire in unexpected ways; and the limited effectiveness of warnings. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:49 am
But there’s a catch: how does the court know that the AWA penalties will be imposed? [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 8:45 am
Smith “How does it feel to be 100? [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:12 am
"Does a moral society execute people? [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
Affirming the judge's findings, the Board found that turnover since the Respondent's commission of the unfair labor practices does not militate against a bargaining order. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 10:55 am
The IRP process does not result in approval of a proposed resource plan or approval of construction or acquisition or any particular resources. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
A declaration does not have the effect of making primary legislation invalid. [read post]
