Search for: "Does 1-104"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2022, 4:49 am
§ 104(f)(1)-(5). [5] “Tenor Spread Adjustment” shall mean— (A) 0.00644 percent for overnight LIBOR; (B) 0.11448 percent for 1-month LIBOR; (C) 0.26161 percent for 3-month LIBOR; (D) 0.42826 percent for 6-month LIBOR; and (E) 0.7151 [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:37 pm
To be sure, 104(1) also prohibits aiding the enemy with "other things. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 1:11 pm
"First Auxiliary Request"1. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 1:11 pm
"First Auxiliary Request"1. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:09 am
IPO Vital Signs does not track closed-end funds, best efforts or non-underwritten deals, or IPO offerings for amounts less than $5 million. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 9:00 pm
The taking of unfair advantage of the distinctive character or the repute of a mark pursuant to Article 5(2) of Directive 89/104/EEC does not require a likelihood of confusion or detriment to the distinctive character or the repute of the mark. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:37 am
Council Directive 89/104 ...and Article 13(1) of ... [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
Council Directive 89/104 ...and Article 13(1) of ... [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Sparrow, 1990 CanLII 104 (SCC), [1990] 1 SCR 1075 There is no explicit language in the provision that authorizes this Court or any court to assess the legitimacy of any government legislation that restricts aboriginal rights. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:24 am
(2) If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, must it then be accepted that in circumstances such as those in the case at issue, the mere presence in a Member State of such goods (which have been placed under a duty suspension arrangement in that Member State) does not prejudice, or cannot prejudice, the functions of the trade mark, with the result that the trade mark proprietor which invokes national trade mark rights in that Member State cannot oppose that presence? [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:55 pm
or “Does 1-50, inclusive”). [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 2:45 pm
Home Depot,Inc., 104 F.3d 1299, 1303 (Fed. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:40 pm
" Sec. 1.104-1(c), Income Tax Regs. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 10:22 am
L. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996)) “when a rule is expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:27 am
Question - Does the government share in the damages award in the form of taxes? [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
Article 5(1)(a) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks and Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark is entitled to prohibit an advertiser from advertising, on the basis of a keyword identical with that [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 5:51 am
Where the government does not show that a Rule 41(g) motion for return of property will interfere with a grand jury investigation, it can be granted. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
See Pub.L. 104-191 §264(a, c) (uncodified).The administrative response was the so-called HIPAA Privacy Rule ("Privacy Rule"), effective April 14, 2003. 68 Fed. [read post]
Supreme Court to Again Consider the Interplay Between a CERCLA Cost Recovery and Contribution Action
2 Apr 2021, 6:24 am
U.S., 950 F.3d 104, 107 (D.C. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
Candelora, 708 A.2d 104, 108 (Pa. [read post]
