Search for: "Does 1-152"
Results 41 - 60
of 860
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
When DOE rejected Nobile's efforts to rescind the stipulation, Nobile sued. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 9:16 am
When an individual does not qualify under the special rules for divorce or separated individuals, the general support tests apply. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:04 pm
Caniglia, 1 Neb. [read post]
5 May 2023, 5:38 am
An appellant who gives a debit order for payment of the reduced appeal fee even though it clearly does not meet the conditions of Rule 6(4,5) EPC commits an obvious mistake in the meaning of J 8/80 and G 1/12. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 9:35 pm
§ 706(2)(E); Dickinson v.Zurko, 527 U.S. 150, 152 (1999); In re Gartside, 203 F.3d1305, 1316 (Fed. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 1:54 am
She does not get her down payment back. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 4:15 am
The Court said in part:152. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 6:02 am
At the end, I aggregate them, weighing each 1/3 like USNWR does, to give an overall percentile total. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 12:18 pm
The extension of the 2022 COVID Supplemental Paid Sick Leave Law does not create new banks of leave for employees and does not change the reasons for which an employee may take leave. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 1:07 pm
Gill, 2008 ND 152, 2008 N.D. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:01 am
The Court then turned to the core tax question.Section 152(b)(3)(A) provides that a dependent “does not include an individual who is not a citizen or national of the United States . . . [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:42 am
Does 1-100, supra. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
So the universe of predicates might look something like a 2x2x2 grid: (1) federal tax law violations by Trump; (2) federal tax law violations by third parties; (3) New York tax law violations by Trump; (4) New York tax law violations by third parties; (5) federal election law violation by Trump; (6) federal election law violations by third parties; (7) New York Election Law § 17-152 violations by Trump; and (8) § 17-152 violations by third parties. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:22 pm
AB 152 does not change the qualifying reasons for SPSL. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 3:38 am
Manufacturing Co., 152 USPQ 441 (TTAB 1966). [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
The legal consequence is that, according to R 152(6), any procedural steps taken by him before 1 April 2011 are deemed not to have been taken. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 11:10 pm
Significantly, AB 152 does not credit employees with additional COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave hours. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:59 am
SEOK AM#1 CORP (W.D.Wash.12-9-2009), Case No. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:08 pm
Does 1-152, 1:11-cv-01833 (DCD) Celestial, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:05 pm
Corp., 340 U.S. 147, 152-153, 71 S. [read post]
