Search for: "Does 1-4" Results 41 - 60 of 60,468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2012, 9:03 am by Ray Beckerman
Defendant Doe #4's motion to dismiss, sever, and quash has been denied, in Malibu Media v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 4:48 am by Derek Black
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EducationLawProfBlog/~4/_87AGVQNfKg" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> [read post]
17 May 2013, 6:44 am by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-198, and certain companion cases, the District Court of Oregon has severed and dismissed, and quashed the subpoenas, as to all Does other than Doe #1, both on the ground that allegations of being in a BitTorrent swarm are not subject to joinder, and on the ground that discretionary factors do not warrant joinder.May 4, 2013, Order, Hon. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 2:25 pm by Jeff
  Although I think the middle two have a whiff of rent-seeking, I can't argue with 1 and 4. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 1:44 pm by Charles Rubin
§726.110(1) provides that an action to reach such transferred property must be commenced within 4 years of the transfer, or if later, within 1 year after the transfer was or could reasonably have been discovered. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 1:44 pm by Charles Rubin
§726.110(1) provides that an action to reach such transferred property must be commenced within 4 years of the transfer, or if later, within 1 year after the transfer was or could reasonably have been discovered. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:29 am by Woodrow Pollack
" The problem with these arguments was they did not deal with the means for quashing a subpoena spelled out in Rule 45, which requires a Court to quash a subpoena when the subpoena: (1) does not allow reasonable time to comply; (2) violates certain geographic restrictions; (3) requires disclosure of protected information; or (4) subjects the recipient to undue burden. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 9:57 am by Marcel Pemsel
Art. 41(1) CDR does not mention patents but only designs and utility models. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 11:31 pm by Graham Purse
Kirchler, The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007) at 182. 6 Lord Denning in Re Weston's Settlements. [1969] 1 Ch. 223 at 245. 7J. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 10:21 am by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-5, a BitTorrent downloading case, the plaintiff has filed papers opposing defendant John Doe #4's motion to dismiss, sever, and quash.The motion papers include a declaration by a "forensic investigator", employed by a company in Germany, who makes claims about the technology he uses.Plaintiff's memorandum of law in oppositionDeclaration of Tobias FieserExhibit AExhibit B Commentary & discussion:Slashdot var addthis_config =… [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:53 pm by Legal Profession Prof
The Florida Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee opines: Opinion Number: 2018-03 Date of Issue: February 4, 2018 ISSUES 1. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 3:17 am by R. David Donoghue
Judge Kendall:  1) denied defendant Doe 15′s motion to dismiss; 2) denied Doe 15′s motion to quash the subpoena of Doe 15′s internet provider; 3) granted Doe 15′s unopposed motion to remain anonymous; and 4) severed each of the 15 defendants, except for Doe 15 in this Bit Torrent copyright case. [read post]
29 May 2008, 4:05 pm
Does 1-4, an unpublished Ninth Circuit memorandum from last week:... [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:53 am by SHG
Rarely does it go as well as they hope. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 7:39 am by Dave Wingate, Senior Life Care Planning
   See 38 C.F.R , Chapter 1, Part 4 for a complete listing of conditions. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 7:38 pm by Howard Wasserman
But brackets are always set up for semis of 1 v. 4 and 2 v. 3.Anyone out there know why the Open does it differently? [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:02 am by Derek Black
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EducationLawProfBlog/~4/NH4EzUQy6hI" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> [read post]