Search for: "Does 1-68"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,489
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm
She stated that she was the primary driver and that her boyfriend does not drive the Cadillac. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm
Secondly, s.1(1) of the Defamation Act 2013 means that claimants now have to prove that the publication caused, or was likely to cause, serious harm to their reputation. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 12:45 pm
Socrates viewed philosophy as beginning in wonder,[1] but Socrates and his philosophic heirs recognized that philosophy does not get down to business until it starts to clarify the terms of discussion. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
Cargill this term, the Court has been asked to decide the narrow question of whether a bump stock device is a “machinegun” as defined in the National Firearms Act.[1] However, embedded within the case is an issue that raises broad administrative law questions about how the rule of lenity interacts with agencies’ interpretations of statutes with criminal implications. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm
Under s.1(1) if a publication does not cause, or is not likely to cause, serious harm to reputation it is not defamatory. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:18 pm
Thus, Forney does not resolve the question of whether an officer’s failure to restart the observation period renders the results inadmissible. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm
During the close-to-close trading sessions affected by a short report, defendant issuers’ stock price declined by 16.8%, on average, and incurred additional declines of 16.0% during the 90-day look-back period of Section 21D(e)(1) of the Private Securities and Litigation Reform Act.[3][4] Third, Rule 10b-5 private securities fraud lawsuits based primarily on activist short-seller research may not be indicative of actual fraud-on-the-market since the work product does not… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 2:22 am
” Simply owning an invention-generating machine does not confer legal rights in the machine’s creations absent some other recognized legal principle. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 4:18 am
This case is important for the pharmaceutical industry in two aspects: 1. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am
The provisions primarily at issue in the litigation on appeal were (1) the term extension to 2085 and (2) an amendment that eliminated the 1987 limitations on repairs, additions and betterments, and added costs for capital improvements approved by DWR and 80% of the contractors. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 10:31 am
For example, the court may offer June 1 for trial. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 10:31 am
For example, the court may offer June 1 for trial. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 10:21 am
Ms Mailley had lived at the property since she was 11 years old and was now 68. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm
Indeed, training AI models does have some important differences from a public performance of a musical work, so it should differ anyway. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
Question #1 – Does OPM maintain its own public registry of individuals and entities who have been debarred or suspended from the FEHBP program? [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:28 am
In T 68/99, for example the fact that certain features were disclosed as preferred in the application as filed acted as a pointer for a selected combination of features. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 2:15 am
But at what point does all that tech do more harm than good? [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:55 am
Those who coined the term “backdoor search” point to a 2019 decision (pp. 68-79), United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
As a capital allocation decision, share buybacks intersect all three of the main corporate finance activities of investing, financing, and dividends[1]. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
KFC was number 68, down from number 66 in 2013. [read post]
