Search for: "Does I & II"
Results 41 - 60
of 23,526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2017, 7:24 am
Successful Phase I projects will compete for Phase II funding in FY 2019 to carry out prototype or processes research and development. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:33 am
The 68 small businesses received Phase II R&D awards after demonstrating technical feasibility for innovations during their Phase I grants and competed for funding for prototype or process development during Phase II. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 12:54 pm
Thus, while Weeks (I or II) focused most of its fire on Foster v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
The post The Effect of Legal Hemp on Drug Dog Sniffs (Part II) appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 7:50 pm
Case Links: • Bradley I: N-MCCA opinion • Bradley I: CAAF oral argument audio • Bradley I: CAAF opinion • Bradley I: Blog post: CAAF issues two more opinions • Bradley II: N-MCCA opinion • Bradley II: Appellant’s brief • Bradley II: Appellee’s (government) brief • Bradley II: Blog Post: Argument preview • Bradley II: CAAF Opinion • Bradley II: Blog… [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 1:52 am
Leonardi released a statement titled “Solvency II: ‘One Size Does Not Fit All’,” in which he warns that adopting Solvency II (as previously reported here) standards in the U.S. could “weaken consumer protections and stability of insurers. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 7:34 am
I solemnly Promise soe to doe. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 8:54 am
As it should be clear by now, Schrems II does not implicate only commercial data transfers in the tech and digital sectors. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 11:00 am
Rather, as I explained in my first point, “the lawful exercise of an Article II power—whether signing an executive agreement or vetoing a bill—does not give rise to an impeachable offense. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 10:29 am
At present, Rome II does not apply to the media, whereas Brussels I does. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
Here is Part II: Pro Se Litigants I have spoken about the indigent. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:27 am
The FDA review noted that marijuana use does not produce the kinds of negative health outcomes associated with other Schedule I drugs like heroin, despite marijuana being much more readily available. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:25 am
This update does not change policy or operations. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 5:25 am
Last year, I wrote a post asking whether Fisher I should be understood as a precedent on jurisdiction. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 9:03 pm
How does commerce work? [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:38 am
And I understand why based on the record before the court, he argues against abstention as he does. [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 11:03 am
[The underlying report is in Norwegian, so I am relying on Google Translate here.] [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 5:18 am
Parts I and II were both adopted pursuant to the Bureau’s authority under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and not its UDAAP authority under the Dodd-Frank Act, and are effective November 30, 2021. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 1:21 am
It's been a while since I last blogged about Solvency II. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 9:50 am
I’ll be on Tony Martignetti’s Nonprofit Radio podcast speaking with Tony in Part II of our two-part discussion on nonprofit risk management. [read post]
