Search for: "E. S. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, LLC"
Results 41 - 60
of 487
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2022, 7:10 am
McAleenan, where the group challenged the Department of Homeland Security’s waiver of multiple laws in order to construct a 20-mile segment of the border wall in New Mexico. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 1:50 pm
SIZ-5864 (2017); Size Appeal of BR Construction, LLC, SBA No. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 7:32 am
Lighting Retrofit International, LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
., doing business as Meridith Baer and Associates, and the defendants, Joan E. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:36 pm
The case involved two main parties, including Weyerhaeuser, a product manufacturer which designed and sold engineered joists with a fire-resistant coating to be used in residential construction, and Dream Finders, a home builder, which purchased and utilized Weyerhaeuser’s fire-resistant joists in homes it constructed and sold. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”) applied to the City of Tustin (the “City”) for a conditional use permit and design review approval to build a new 32-pump gas station project next to an existing Costco warehouse. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 8:17 am
The author presents a case pending before the Supreme Court Patent that addresses this question (Olaf Sööt Design, LLC v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
” In support of her petition, the mother submitted the father’s 2018 federal tax return, which demonstrated that the father’s total income was $117,316, a substantial increase from his $45,000 annual income at the time the stipulation was entered. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am
Lavi Apartments, LLC, 2021 WL 5359715 (S.D. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:44 pm
City of San Jose (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 1325, 1345 [my 11/12/13 post on which can be found here]; Clews Land & Livestock, LLC v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus, violated the… [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus, violated the… [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 12:59 pm
Alvarez, managing principal at BridgeCounsel Strategies LLC. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
Defective design (along the lines of Lemmon v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on James E. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 9:19 am
Those websites should be designed so as to minimize claims of surprise and lack of assent. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 12:12 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit concluded, on the merits, that that Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Eviction Moratorium is unlawful in Tiger Lily, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:46 am
Advertising/E-Commerce * Ariix, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:53 am
An example of a construction dispute that took a nasty turn involving an interior decorator is SG 2901, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm
Rooming House Act did not apply to Assisted Living Facility here ESTATE OF JAMES BURNS, by and through BRIAN BURNS, EXECUTOR,v CARE ONE AT STANWICK, LLC d/b/a CARE ONE HARMONY VILLAGE AT MOORESTOWN and CARE ONE, LLC,SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISIONDOCKET NO. [read post]
