Search for: "Evergreen Holdings, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2008, 7:39 am
Wachovia Corporation will continue to own the retail brokerage firm AG Edwards and the money management arm Evergreen. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Asda Stores Ltd v Brierly & Ors, heard 13-14 June 2020 Takhar… [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd & Ors, heard 23 July 2020 Allykhan v Abdool (Mauritius), heard 23 July 2020 Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd v Nautical Challenge Ltd, heard 5-6 October 2020 Manchester Building Society… [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 26 and Wednesday 27 January, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Balhousie Holdings Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (Scotland). [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:04 am by admin
  Massachusetts officials believe they may be legally able to salvage only about $3 million of $21 million in grants given four years ago to Evergreen Solar Inc. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:47 pm by Dennis Crouch
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 7 F.4th 1320, 1333 (Fed. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Friday 5 February, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in R (on the application of KBR, Inc) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:59 am by Don Cruse
Any holdings that state courts might reach in such a narrowly defined context are unlikely to disturb the uniformity of federal patent law. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:59 am by Don Cruse
Any holdings that state courts might reach in such a narrowly defined context are unlikely to disturb the uniformity of federal patent law. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:59 am by Don Cruse
Any holdings that state courts might reach in such a narrowly defined context are unlikely to disturb the uniformity of federal patent law. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:27 pm
Supp. 2d 360, 367 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (holding that “little past dealings” precludes a finding of acceptance  through  a  course  of conduct) with Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 5:23 am by Robert Kreisman
See, e.g., Tower Investors, LLC v. 111 Chestnut Consultants, Inc., 371 Ill.App.3d 1019 (2007). [read post]