Search for: "F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd."
Results 41 - 51
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2009, 10:28 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 4:55 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. , Amgen's patent infringement suit over Roche's Mircera ® drug product (see "Victory for Amgen in District Court Decision - Part I"). [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 4:45 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Amgen's patent infringement suit over Roche's Mircera ® drug product. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
:Interpharma Pty Ltd v Commisioner of Patents (GenericsWeb) Gemzar (Gemcitabine) - US: Eli Lilly sues Teva for patent infringement and seek declaratory judgment (The IP Factor) (Law360) Glivec (Imatinib) - India: Supreme Court appoints Dr Chakraborty as technical member on IPAB panel hearing Glivec appeal (Spicy IP) Jeevani (Arogyapacha) - India: Recent developments in the Arogypacha case (Spicy IP) Miralax (Polyethylene glycol) - US: 'Advice of scientist' defense… [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 7:22 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., 417 F.3d 1267, 1271 (D.C. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at [feeds.feedburner.com]GlobalComing out of copyright - some notable deaths from 1937: (IPKat),Design patents: No longer the province of individual inventors: (Patently O),Fail fast, ready fire aim and Stanford v Cal: (IP Think Tank),Walls, Alexander the Great and Partha Bose: (IP Think Tank),A fair use primer for online content creators: (Ars Technica)ISO moves to create global… [read post]
28 May 2007, 5:17 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 2:12 am
Hoffmann-La Roche have also filed UDRP complaints based on other trademarked products, such as Valium. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 11:09 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 8:34 pm
Hoffmann-LaRoche, Ltd., several of its affiliated companies (collectively, "Roche") and Daniel Bradley in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 5:00 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]