Search for: "Gravely v. U.S. Department of Justice" Results 41 - 60 of 339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2007, 10:06 am
The Justice Department said on Monday that it will ask the full 12-member Fourth Circuit Court to reconsider en banc the panel decision in Al-Marri v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 5:35 pm
  The test case that went to the Supreme Court — and in doing so put  Section 5 at grave risk — is being settled, according to court papers filed earlier this month in U.S. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 7:25 am by Sarah Harrington
” The CFPB (acting through its own attorneys, i.e., without support from the Department of Justice) filed a petition for rehearing en banc and the petition was granted. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 6:15 pm
Attorneys or staff attorneys in the Justice Department filed their  amicus brief to challenge the Fourth Circuit Court’s ruling upholding presidential authority to detain an individual who was legally in the U.S., but was suspected of terrorist links. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 10:38 am by Alejandro Agustin Ortiz
Department of Justice, a key voice federal courts regularly hear from, continues to depend on them. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
Department of State’s Office of Global Criminal Justice: It will take time to fully digest this morning’s order. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm by Anna Salvatore, Benjamin Wittes
Flynn filed a motion to compel certain material under Brady v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:36 am by Lisa McElroy
 Joining the Department of Justice after his clerkship, tapped to take on a key role in the Japanese internment camp controversy, he asks, “Who do we serve, the lawyers of Justice? [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:00 pm by Charlie Dunlap
  In other words, it rejects the proposition reflected in the 1986 International Court of Justice case of Nicaragua v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 12:52 pm by William Ford
The Justice Department characterized the prospect of this release and the declassification of sensitive information as “extraordinarily reckless”; Democrats on the committee hold that the memo’s conclusions are gravely misleading. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm by Ellis Cose
Two other cases were not decided until after the War Department had concluded that internment was no longer a military necessity. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 6:30 pm
Diaz, joined in his Dec. 11 dissent by Justice James Graves Jr., said he had voted many times to uphold death sentences. [read post]