Search for: "Green v. State of Tennessee" Results 41 - 60 of 192
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2020, 7:54 am by Aviel Menter
Hargett, a Tennessee state court initially interpreted the Tennessee Constitution to guarantee a universal right to vote by mail. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:54 am by Aviel Menter
Hargett, a Tennessee state court initially interpreted the Tennessee Constitution to guarantee a universal right to vote by mail. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Barrett graduated magna cum laude from Rhodes College, a liberal arts college in Tennessee affiliated with the Presbyterian Church, in 1994. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am by INFORRM
United States On 24 August Reuters had an article “Sarah Palin can sue New York Times for defamation – court ruling”. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The omission is especially curious because in two prior cases—Tennessee v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 12:42 pm by Nicholas Mosvick
Green, the Court followed Colegrove in stating that, “[i]t would be strange indeed, and doctrinaire, for this Court, applying such broad constitutional concepts as due process and equal protection of the laws, to deny a State the power to assure a proper diffusion of political initiative. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 8:56 pm by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Johnson City, TN, his application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 9:15 am by Dan Schweitzer
United States and Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
Carr, the landmark 1962 case in which voters from Tennessee complained that the state’s malapportioned state legislative districts violated the equal protection clause, the Constitution has served as an effective limit on the propensity of politicians to manipulate election districts for their own political gain. [read post]