Search for: "Hands On Originals, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 3,546
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by Miriam Becker-Cohen
The Court held nearly 25 years ago in Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 7:34 am by Paul Willetts
The only possible consideration was that the plaintiff could keep the job if she now agreed to the additional, onerous and detrimental terms which had not been included in, or even contemplated by, the original agreement. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 3:11 pm by Francis Pileggi
   The Delaware Court of Chancery, citing the milestone Corwin decision, recently dismissed a suit by Anaplan Inc. shareholders who claimed post-merger pact equity grants for some officers and directors cheated them out of $400 million of the original $10.7 billion price pursuant to a merger agreement requiring Thoma Bravo (not a typo) to pay for the business planning software company in In re Anaplan Inc. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 7:42 am by centerforartlaw
This includes ensuring that digital copies accurately capture the essence and details of the original works. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:43 am by Josh Blackman
The Times explains what moved Gorsuch from off-the-wall to on-the-wall: an opinion calling the administrative state a "behemoth": Back in 2016, a colleague handed Donald F. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 7:37 am by Tim Zinnecker
Clayton—a 1964 graduate of the College of Law and the founder of Clayton Homes, Inc. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 5:23 am by Phil Dixon
Supreme Court’s decision in New York Rife and Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am by Benson Varghese
Originally targeting psychiatric testimony in insanity defense cases, Rule 704(b) has since been broadly applied by courts to prohibit expert opinions on a defendant’s mental state in any crime where it is an element. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am by Benson Varghese
Originally targeting psychiatric testimony in insanity defense cases, Rule 704(b) has since been broadly applied by courts to prohibit expert opinions on a defendant’s mental state in any crime where it is an element. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am by Benson Varghese
Originally targeting psychiatric testimony in insanity defense cases, Rule 704(b) has since been broadly applied by courts to prohibit expert opinions on a defendant’s mental state in any crime where it is an element. [read post]