Search for: "Howmedica Osteonics" Results 41 - 60 of 86
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm by Cal Warriner
The alloy is advertised by Stryker as a proprietary blend of titanium, iron, molybdenum, and zirconium developed by Howmedica Osteonics. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm by Cal Warriner
The alloy is advertised by Stryker as a proprietary blend of titanium, iron, molybdenum, and zirconium developed by Howmedica Osteonics. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:13 pm by Bexis
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., ___ F. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm by Bexis
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., ___ F. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:01 am by Bexis
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., 597 F.Supp.2d 830, 840–41 (S.D. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
By now Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A (1965) is so old as to be thought of as somewhat antediluvian. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by Bexis
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., 597 F. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm by Bexis
We’ve blogged repeatedly about preemption in PMA medical device cases. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
Howmedica, Inc., 273 F.3d 785, 789 n.5 (8th Cir. 2001) (post-use downclassification of same product at issue in Rosseau did not affect Class III status, and therefore preemption; no analysis); Scott v. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 1:00 am
See Howmedica Osteonics v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:35 am by Dave Wieneke
Our friends at The Pop Tort recently found a great example of this hypocrisy: We are thrilled to report that Wright Medical Group Inc and Howmedica Osteonics Corp., a subsidiary of Stryker Corp., have resolved their copyright infringement lawsuit! [read post]